- Joined
- Jan 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,265
Yep. I agree. Tick eradication could be the most serendipitous decision we ever made.
If I ran the zoo, my call would be a % decrease in the tick population and a waiting period to observe the impact that may have before we pull the plug on them entirely. Preferably a long one, since eradication doesn't seem necessary to immediate well-being for humanity. But I don't run the zoo, and since we live in a world with 2-4 year election cycles and quarterly profit reports...I'm not holding my breath for us to become patient and calculated and risk-averse in a sane way.
interesting google search
the top hits basically point out that ticks are food for other things...well, this doesn't mean they are that important...you have to show that they are not substitutable by something else or that something would be malnourished without them
again with the weird perspective ecologists can have
this is like noticing that humans put black olives on their salads and concluding that black olives are very important to human nutrition
Last edited: