Absolutely agree. But I am also of the "safety third" mentality, meaning that if safety is our #1 priority and we need 100% safety, then in this context the only course of action is us to choose to not climb the tree in the first place.
My only intention of this entire thread was to explore and discuss why the saddle hunting community gravitates to static ropes for one-stick climbing when dynamic ropes may offer some benefit. After all, one-stick climbing has largely transitioned the way we use ropes as saddle hunters. Traditional saddle hunting uses tethers for rigging purposes, whereas one-stick climbing shifts the use of the tether to something closer to lead-climbing since there will inevitably be some slack in the line as you climb, regardless of how much we try to advance the tether or use a linemans belt, at least in some situations.
@GCTerpfan I get what you're saying, but there were several posts at least alluding to it making no difference. If I recall, there was one that said you would be eating out of a straw either way. That, I disagree with. I don't think there is anything that can make a fall completely safe. Best we can do is mitigate the risk, and I'm becoming more and more convinced that dynamic rope is a large step toward that when climbing with your tether.