Kurt
Well-Known Member
I think if more folks got away from mechanical broadheads and went to CoC, or at a minimum fixed position heads, we as a group would be better off. I don't think 650+ is for everyone. It's pretty easy to up arrow weights with heavier heads. There's a lot of companies out there that are making some nice heads with some weight to them. If you just happen to be putting some arrows together for next year, just look into heavier inserts, different heads, and if your buying new shafts any way look into getting a stiffer spine. In my arrow build research I found the RF Is doing amazing things off of 340 and 300 spine shafts. Most off us are shooting them any way. He's finding that the spine charts aren't as accurate as we all believe they are, but you have to put in some work to see if you even need stiffer shafts. I stayed away from aluminum anything on my arrows. It's easy to put in better components than most are buying at their local shop. It beefs up the arrow and adds some weight to boot. I went the whole nine yards. Stainless steel insert and footer. Went with a heavier cut on contact head, and I beefed up my shafts to boot. It wasn't that much more money and I have insurance against less than ideal shots. I'm learning a ton, and I'm having a good time doing it. Even Ashby said we need to balance trajectories with the weights we shoot, and we need to keep in mind what we're hunting. I don't think we should continue as a group to be satisfied with the minimum, but should in fact be building in insurance against poor penetration. Hand in hand with all this is the need to push arrows farther forward to send all these great heads we all love into the vital V. Instead of shooting 2 inches back from the crease, shoot 2 inches forward of the crease on broadside shots. Bigger plumbing up there. Can anyone argue with the fact that animals would die faster if we could put more super sharp CoC, or fix bladed heads through the larger plumbing farther forward?