• The SH Membership has gone live. Only SH Members have access to post in the classifieds. All members can view the classifieds. Starting in 2020 only SH Members will be admitted to the annual hunting contest. Current members will need to follow these steps to upgrade: 1. Click on your username 2. Click on Account upgrades 3. Choose SH Member and purchase.
  • We've been working hard the past few weeks to come up with some big changes to our vendor policies to meet the changing needs of our community. Please see the new vendor rules here: Vendor Access Area Rules

For those concerned about the weight of the JX3 Hybrid

kyler1945

Well-Known Member
SH Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,916
Location
Willis, TX
I've edited the original content of this post. I screwed up my math in the handwritten stuff in later posts, but I correct it. In this post I've updated the weight of my setup based on the completed modification of the hybrid.

You can check out how I have my hybrid set up right now here:


Major differences between mine and stock old style is exo shoulder harness, ground chair standoffs removed, half of the surface area of fork plate removed, climbing sling bridge replaced the stock webbing bridge, exo hip belt. If someone wants to weigh their stock old style hybrid, mine weighs 160 ounces as is, bare. New style hybrid weighs 192 ounces (neither weight includes ropes).

Now that that is out of the way, I wanted to show how much of a weight penalty I incur when carrying the hybrid, versus a minimal saddle. I took my kit, as is, from a hunt yesterday. I pulled every single item and weighed to the tenth of an ounce. I did not include food/water/layers. But if I did, they would further reduce the relative difference of weight between the setups.

Total of my bare minimum setup - less than 1/2 mile from the truck, I know where I'm going, don't need thermacel, etc... is 19.2 lbs with the hybrid.

If I add all the goodies for a long trip, and luxury items, and stuff to pack out deer, total weight is 24.2 lbs.

If I swap to the kestrel/ ridge runner platform, and a lightweight normal pack, weight is 16.6lbs.

If I swap to kestrel/ridge runner, and frame pack for deep trips and luxury items, weight is 23.2lbs.



I'm paying a 2.6 lb weight penalty to use the hybrid close to the truck. Or, with the kits as is, and not including food/water/layers, an 16% weight penalty.

Luxury setup - 4.5% penalty, or 1lb.


If I factor in 15lbs for food water and heavy layers, my penalty is 2.5%, or 1lb.


All of the above changes with the new generation of hybrid, with the JX3 frame instead of the Molle Frame. It's my understanding that the new version weight 192 ounces, without ropes. If someone knows I'm off here, let me know and I'll adjust. So we can add 32 ounces.

Minimal setup with New Hybrid - 21.2lbs. 22% (or 4.6lbs) penalty for close fast hunts.

Luxury setup with new hybrid - 11.5% penalty (or 3lbs)

Long distance/cold weather with new hybrid - 7.5% penalty (or 3lbs)




I'm not telling you that the hybrid is not heavier than a minimal saddle. I'm not telling you that it doesn't have other drawbacks.

What I am telling you, is that if you're honest about the weight of your kit, and honest about the time, money effort, thought, etc. that goes into hunting and equipment, the difference is probably not nearly as big as you make it in your head. The comfort and ability to be dead still for long periods of time, and especially at the best times, are important to me.

Your mileage may vary. You can obviously play the weight game yourself. This is just one guy's example....
 
Last edited:
Unless you're going all-in on minimalism/weightweeinism (e.g. climbing carbon bolts to a ring of steps or bolts, using only lightweight ropes and biners, etc.) - basically trimming your kit down to little enough to not need a meaningful pack at all, the weight difference just can't be meaningful.
 
Update, my math on hybrid minimal kit was off by 15 ounces. total is 296.8 - so my minimal setup is 18.55lbs for the hybrid, versus 265.6 (16.6lbs).
 
I come up with similar penalty. I think of it as roughly 3 lbs. I look at this way (but same basic result..using your measurements above but in lbs):

1. JX-3 is 10.5 lbs / Recon is 1.75 lb = starting penalty is 8.75 lbs.
2. Ropes are the same, stuff you bring is the same, climbing method is the same.
3. Recon you need knee pads, platform, and a pack. Using your numbers that's 8 ounces + 60 ounces + 40 ounces = 108 ounces or 6.75 lbs. Now penalty is down to 2 lbs.
4. You do need steps for the JX-3, You have 2 at roughly 1 lb.
5. Now your weight penalty is 3 lbs.

I guess some people might have lighter pack (2.5 lbs / 40 ounces) seems a little high to me but I haven't weighed any. So maybe minimalist guys may get the weight penalty up a bit higher by saving on the pack itself...not sure. Also, I use pouches to carry my stuff in the JX-3...I'm not sure if you've factored that in. But, again not a lot of weight.

But, in any regard I completely agree with your underlying point that the weight penalty is less than what it first appears.
 
My “pack” for the hybrid currently weighs 14.8 ounces. The listed weight of my hybrid as modified Also includes a bino pouch that I keep my rappel rope in. It weighs something like 6 ounces. I suspect that most folks aren’t getting a hunting capable pack for less than 30 ounces that doesn’t get ripped to shreds or sound like a potato chip bag.
 
Edit to the edit, I found the discrepancy with the math. I forgot to add ROS for hybrid, which brings the weight penalty back to 3lbs on light setup, and 1.5lbs on heavy setup. I was trying to do too many things at once...
 
I come up with similar penalty. I think of it as roughly 3 lbs. I look at this way (but same basic result..using your measurements above but in lbs):

1. JX-3 is 10.5 lbs / Recon is 1.75 lb = starting penalty is 8.75 lbs.
2. Ropes are the same, stuff you bring is the same, climbing method is the same.
3. Recon you need knee pads, platform, and a pack. Using your numbers that's 8 ounces + 60 ounces + 40 ounces = 108 ounces or 6.75 lbs. Now penalty is down to 2 lbs.
4. You do need steps for the JX-3, You have 2 at roughly 1 lb.
5. Now your weight penalty is 3 lbs.

I guess some people might have lighter pack (2.5 lbs / 40 ounces) seems a little high to me but I haven't weighed any. So maybe minimalist guys may get the weight penalty up a bit higher by saving on the pack itself...not sure. Also, I use pouches to carry my stuff in the JX-3...I'm not sure if you've factored that in. But, again not a lot of weight.

But, in any regard I completely agree with your underlying point that the weight penalty is less than what it first appears.
If you factor in pack weight for a framed pack you are closer to 4 - 6 lb. 2.5 is a non framed pack and still a light one at that. For reference, the CAYS pack is 3.6 lb. There are a few sub 4 lb framed packs and they are $500 plus. Factor cost and weight and the JX3 is looking pretty good.
 
If you factor in pack weight for a framed pack you are closer to 4 - 6 lb. 2.5 is a non framed pack and still a light one at that. For reference, the CAYS pack is 3.6 lb. There are a few sub 4 lb framed packs and they are $500 plus. Factor cost and weight and the JX3 is looking pretty good.


This is why i referenced two setups - heavy and light. Heavy takes into consideration added weight of a frame pack (mine is 4.8lbs), light takes a stab at roughly 2.5lb for a normal backpack.
 
My saddle weighs 28 oz, my platform weighs 39 oz, Alps says my Big Bear pack weighs 2 lb 5 oz or 37 oz. Total 104 oz. 182 - 104 = 78 oz or 4.875 lbs. Not too much difference.


 
Great write up. This is an interesting exercise that I have done several times. Most of my spots are so challenging to get to that every pound really does matter. I have never been able to get comfortable in a traditional saddle. Trust me it’s the Miles not the years, so when I do a weight comparison it’s always comparing the JX 3 to my Horn Hunter pack with millennium tree seat. If memory serves the weight difference is somewhere around 4 to 5 pounds.

The advantage of being up off the ground while bow hunting doesn’t need any explanation, but even during rifle season I really appreciate the expanded field of view that I realize when getting up off the ground even only 8 to 10 feet. In some situations this can increase my field of view by two or three times which can greatly impact my success with a rifle. For this reason alone I will incur a 15% weight penalty.
 
Back
Top