Do you go for the spine and hope to drop them or go for vitals and risk only one lung?
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
I'm just reading on the site here about people going up 25-30 feet. Seems like anything inside of bow range at that height gives a steep angle.I’m assuming you are talking about archery hunting and a deer almost under your stand location. In that scenario I would wait for the deer to offer a broader shot at the vitals rather than risk the one lung shot.
True, those steep angles do make the vital area a narrow target. We would have to be very confident in our ability and equipment to take a dedicated spine shot because a one lung is not going to be a higher percentage recovery rate.I'm just reading on the site here about people going up 25-30 feet. Seems like anything inside of bow range at that height gives a steep angle.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
Hills can make 20-30 ft lower (and higher). Climb to the best cover/visibility/location/etc. And take only the good shots.True, those steep angles do make the vital area a narrow target. We would have to be very confident in our ability and equipment to take a dedicated spine shot because a one lung is not going to be a higher percentage recovery rate.
30 yards and 30 feet is only an 18 degree angle. 20 yards about 26 degrees. Obviously 10 yards and in you get into pretty tight angles, and you need to pay attention to your shot selection and execution, but longer ranges aren't that extreme. Very good reminder to review anatomy.I'm just reading on the site here about people going up 25-30 feet. Seems like anything inside of bow range at that height gives a steep angle.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
I think I'd agree with that.In hunter safety they mention that aiming for a spine shot is unethical. I'd have to agree
I rarely go over 20 ft. in a tree for that reason. You're better off hunting 14'-18' so you've got better shot angles.I'm just reading on the site here about people going up 25-30 feet. Seems like anything inside of bow range at that height gives a steep angle.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
It's been about that long since I spine shot 2 of my first 3 deer(rifle)! (One was a Lungshot that went a tad high, other dropped his head behind a log feeding with his spine lined up vertically, and it felt like a reasonable shot.It’s been 25yrs since I took hunters ed. I can’t say I remember the discussion of spine shot ethics. It is good to hear that the class has become more than hunters safety and regulation review.
A spine shot with a rifle is risky but considerably easier to pull off cleanly. I can not remember spine shooting one intentionally , other than in the cerebellum, with a rifle but I have shot high at longer ranges with a rifle. All those shots did contact the spine at the same time they severed the arteries underneath and were immediately fatal. I’m thankful to have never experienced the broke down deer in panic with a high spine paralyzing shot.It's been about that long since I spine shot 2 of my first 3 deer(rifle)! (One was a Lungshot that went a tad high, other dropped his head behind a log feeding with his spine lined up vertically, and it felt like a reasonable shot.
Higher used to always be better...but that was before the saddle. Although it wasn't a shooter I moved around a tree the other day with my platform height around 18' unseen. I know in some cases 25' makes perfect sense but with a lot of leaves still on the trees in my area I'm hoping to avoid that decision.I rarely go over 20 ft. in a tree for that reason. You're better off hunting 14'-18' so you've got better shot angles.