Gerg
Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2017
- Messages
- 43
Part one of the scent control debate between John Eberhart and Dan Infalt is up here. http://www.downsouthhunting.com/
Last edited:
Me as well...but without question I will in no wise be "checking in" on the other site for analysis. That is futile.Great podcast. Looking forward to Part 2 & Part 3
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I listen to most, try a little from each, and adopt what works for me and the particular area I am hunting.
Bingo. Nice to see this thread much more open minded than the other one. You can learn a lot from both hunters and no issue treating their philosophies like a cafeteria.I agree both of these gents have valid points/techniques and I have learned from both. I frequent another site where closed minds seems to be the norm for some and the need to discredit abounds..... and many still believes one methods is the "Holy Grail" of hunting. I listen to most, try a little from each, and adopt what works for me and the particular area I am hunting. I have picked up a ton of great tactics and tools right here.... I would still be using prussic knots had not someone brought the Ropeman and Kong Duck to my attention.
I have not listened to the podcast yet, but I could not agree with this statement any more Dave. I think the thing to take from both of these guys is that they have developed awesome systems that work for them. Everyone needs to find a system that works for themselves in the area that they are hunting.
And it is hard to blame either one of these guys for being "set in their ways". Over time they developed a system that works great for them. Once you develop that with the success they have, why would you change?
Over time they developed a system that works great for them. Once you develop that with the success they have, why would you change?
Me being Naive to forums and all and was directed to check out the podcast by John E . I didn't realize that the host (s) were very active disciples/members ( along with yourself ) on the other site until yesterday, it kind of makes sense now how the heavily editing fits into the finished product of the podcast. I am now taking that into consideration before making judgements about one of the guests demeanor. But I do agree, interested in parts 2/3.Great podcast. Looking forward to Part 2 & Part 3
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think saddle hunters are in general more open minded. Always willing to try and improve.Bingo. Nice to see this thread much more open minded than the other one. You can learn a lot from both hunters and no issue treating their philosophies like a cafeteria.
I'm looking forward to the later podcasts. I posed some good questions for John.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
TotallyTwo masters sharing their wisdom? What's to argue with? I'll take a page out of both of their books and hope I can be even a fraction as successful while being grateful they shared their knowledge at all!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk