- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
- Messages
- 700
Part 1
Proper use of Fake Tactics – Part 1 Rattling/Sparring
With baiting being banned in 16 counties for 2018 and in all southern Michigan counties for 2019 bow hunters may want to consider the use of tactics such as rattling, sparring, decoys, mock scrapes, sex attractant scents, and grunts, wheeze, bleat and fawn calls in an attempt to entice deer in close enough for bowhunters to receive kill opportunities. However, some factors should be taken into consideration before doing so.
Wouldn’t it be awesome if a one size fits all generic article could be written or video be made on performing tactics and have that information fit for all for all deer hunting properties and circumstances across the country or even just here in our diverse hunting state?
Well that would be wonderful but unfortunately it’s literally impossible because from state to state, area to area within each state and oftentimes from section to section within a county there are monumental discrepancies in the amounts of hunters in an area, their kill criteria’s, how they hunt, how frequently they hunt and the general landscape of the property. While the amount of hunting pressure and hunter kill criteria’s have a direct correlation on how many mature bucks may be in a given area, each of those hunting parameters have some form of effect on daylight responses to tactics even if they’re performed perfectly, at the right times of day and season and in the right places.
Let’s focus on Michigan because we have more bowhunters than any other state and for hunters that don’t own, lease or have much property to hunt, Michigan is the most difficult state to kill a mature buck in. That’s why many bowhunters I know continue to opt out of bowhunting in Michigan to hunt in less pressured states like Ohio, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Indiana and Wisconsin where taking mature buck’s is to put it bluntly, much simpler and I’m positive of that because I also go out of state for a week during Michigan’s gun season to continue bowhunting.
Aside from Michigan’s hunter density issues we also have another disadvantage when it comes to taking mature bucks and that is that we are a two buck state. With 320,000 licensed bow and crossbow hunters and 700,000 gun hunters each being able to kill two bucks, it’s amazing how any buck reaches maturity, but a few do and their really difficult to kill.
In heavily pressured areas where most hunters target any legal antlered buck, year and a half old bucks sporting their first set of antlers either learn quickly how to avoid hunters or they get wounded or killed, it’s that simple. Once they reach 2 ½ their pretty smart and those very few that reach the ripe old age of 3 ½ years old seemingly have Masters Degrees at avoiding hunters and typically do so by moving as little as possible outside their secure bedding areas during daylight hours and not falling for the hunter tactics that they’ve heard, seen or smelled on many occasions while growing up.
Michigan does have areas with extremely low hunter densities and the entire Upper Peninsula falls into that category. There are also many isolated large leases, private lands and hunt clubs in the southern Peninsula with minimal hunting pressure that manage their properties for trophy bucks by implementing either antler or age kill criteria’s.
On lightly hunted and managed properties where antlered bucks are allowed to pass by hunters with no negative consequences until they reach specific kill criteria’s, once they reach it they are much more likely to respond positively to tactics than mature bucks in heavily pressured areas because since their first antlered season they’ve been passed on when responding to tactics that were meant to call in mature bucks. By the time a buck reaches the kill criteria they are much more tolerant of human intrusions, odor and faulty tactics than mature bucks in heavily pressured areas.
No matter the game animal or foul, when and wherever there are no negative consequences for interactions with humans or hunters in this case, there are no reasons for them to alter their lack of fear of them or change their behavior. That’s why there’s hundreds of geese on every golf course, dozens of squirrels in every yard, and deer that don’t pay much attention to people in the outlying edges of every large city limits, in non-hunting state and federal parks, in lake associations, etc.
Because of the heavy hunting pressure on public lands in southern Michigan and in rural areas where it’s common to have 10 to 20 property owners per square mile with one to several hunters on each, what few mature bucks that exist are far more in sync with their survival instincts than their same aged brethren in lightly hunted and managed properties.
The amount and type of hunting pressure an area receives and how the property is laid out concerning security cover in the form of swamps, brush and marsh grass bedding areas, secure transition zones, mature timber with dense understudy, bedding area crops such as standing corn and dense river and creek bottom edges, or on the opposite side of security cover, open timber, exposed food plots and short crop fields also have a lot to do with how a buck may or may not respond to tactics.
Proper use of Fake Tactics – Part 1 Rattling/Sparring
With baiting being banned in 16 counties for 2018 and in all southern Michigan counties for 2019 bow hunters may want to consider the use of tactics such as rattling, sparring, decoys, mock scrapes, sex attractant scents, and grunts, wheeze, bleat and fawn calls in an attempt to entice deer in close enough for bowhunters to receive kill opportunities. However, some factors should be taken into consideration before doing so.
Wouldn’t it be awesome if a one size fits all generic article could be written or video be made on performing tactics and have that information fit for all for all deer hunting properties and circumstances across the country or even just here in our diverse hunting state?
Well that would be wonderful but unfortunately it’s literally impossible because from state to state, area to area within each state and oftentimes from section to section within a county there are monumental discrepancies in the amounts of hunters in an area, their kill criteria’s, how they hunt, how frequently they hunt and the general landscape of the property. While the amount of hunting pressure and hunter kill criteria’s have a direct correlation on how many mature bucks may be in a given area, each of those hunting parameters have some form of effect on daylight responses to tactics even if they’re performed perfectly, at the right times of day and season and in the right places.
Let’s focus on Michigan because we have more bowhunters than any other state and for hunters that don’t own, lease or have much property to hunt, Michigan is the most difficult state to kill a mature buck in. That’s why many bowhunters I know continue to opt out of bowhunting in Michigan to hunt in less pressured states like Ohio, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Indiana and Wisconsin where taking mature buck’s is to put it bluntly, much simpler and I’m positive of that because I also go out of state for a week during Michigan’s gun season to continue bowhunting.
Aside from Michigan’s hunter density issues we also have another disadvantage when it comes to taking mature bucks and that is that we are a two buck state. With 320,000 licensed bow and crossbow hunters and 700,000 gun hunters each being able to kill two bucks, it’s amazing how any buck reaches maturity, but a few do and their really difficult to kill.
In heavily pressured areas where most hunters target any legal antlered buck, year and a half old bucks sporting their first set of antlers either learn quickly how to avoid hunters or they get wounded or killed, it’s that simple. Once they reach 2 ½ their pretty smart and those very few that reach the ripe old age of 3 ½ years old seemingly have Masters Degrees at avoiding hunters and typically do so by moving as little as possible outside their secure bedding areas during daylight hours and not falling for the hunter tactics that they’ve heard, seen or smelled on many occasions while growing up.
Michigan does have areas with extremely low hunter densities and the entire Upper Peninsula falls into that category. There are also many isolated large leases, private lands and hunt clubs in the southern Peninsula with minimal hunting pressure that manage their properties for trophy bucks by implementing either antler or age kill criteria’s.
On lightly hunted and managed properties where antlered bucks are allowed to pass by hunters with no negative consequences until they reach specific kill criteria’s, once they reach it they are much more likely to respond positively to tactics than mature bucks in heavily pressured areas because since their first antlered season they’ve been passed on when responding to tactics that were meant to call in mature bucks. By the time a buck reaches the kill criteria they are much more tolerant of human intrusions, odor and faulty tactics than mature bucks in heavily pressured areas.
No matter the game animal or foul, when and wherever there are no negative consequences for interactions with humans or hunters in this case, there are no reasons for them to alter their lack of fear of them or change their behavior. That’s why there’s hundreds of geese on every golf course, dozens of squirrels in every yard, and deer that don’t pay much attention to people in the outlying edges of every large city limits, in non-hunting state and federal parks, in lake associations, etc.
Because of the heavy hunting pressure on public lands in southern Michigan and in rural areas where it’s common to have 10 to 20 property owners per square mile with one to several hunters on each, what few mature bucks that exist are far more in sync with their survival instincts than their same aged brethren in lightly hunted and managed properties.
The amount and type of hunting pressure an area receives and how the property is laid out concerning security cover in the form of swamps, brush and marsh grass bedding areas, secure transition zones, mature timber with dense understudy, bedding area crops such as standing corn and dense river and creek bottom edges, or on the opposite side of security cover, open timber, exposed food plots and short crop fields also have a lot to do with how a buck may or may not respond to tactics.