If it’s a nonprofit organization it could be useful but if it’s a government organization we will get screwed over like the AFT, making unnecessary rules. But a set a set of standards might not be a bad thing to prevent the Tethrd types of decisions to rush things out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1. I assume you mean private instead of nonprofit.
2. Anything regulating saddles would almost certainly be private, since it's small enough potatoes that Unc Sam definitely doesn't give a darn.
3. Not sure what you have against the American Federation of Teachers, but I'm pretty sure they're not a government organization.
4. Government acronym organizations are responsible for terribly unnecessary rules like keeping lead out of paint and gasoline, providing guidelines for safe canning, keeping 12 year olds out of coal mines, keeping power companies from dumping arsenic into watersheds, prohibiting tobaco/alcohol companies from touting health benefits from their products and advertising to minors...etc...etc... Do they screw up? Yep. Do they do it more often than other entities? Probs not. Are they often the only recourse citizens have when corporations start acting exclusively in the interest of shareholders instead of considering the interests of stakeholders? Arguably. Is it reductionist to make blanket statements against them? Definitely.