Hopefully it cuts back on the public land pressure a little bit. I think it’s a fair price in regards to public land, but wouldn’t call it a bargain anymore though. I’ve never hunted Iowa, Kansas, or Illinois but I don’t think that’s a valid comparison. If the price did go up in comparison with those states I think the pressure would decrease and the public land hunting might be more comparable. Now if you’re talking private land, outfitters, and leases then maybe it would still be a bargain since those situations can be as good as any other state out there. So I do think it only made sense for them to raise the prices some imo. Now $350 for SC is ridiculous!
Looking at it from my perspective...
I live in PA. Decent hunting here but the odds of seeing a 150 buck are not great. They exist, but 5 year old bucks are few and far between in the heavily hunted area where I live. Pressure is crazy here. Everyone hunts out the back door.
So, I can drive 2 hours, hunt Ohio, where I've had close calls with a legitimate 200" deer and the age class is much better than PA. I can also hunt on Sundays.
I also hunt Iowa when I can draw.
But its $50 per preference point, and 3 points is still not a guarantee in the zone I hunt. So, add $150-$200 to the $570 (if I remember correctly) for an NR license, and its over $700 for a tag. Plus another $2k for trespass fees and lodging (10 day hunt), and its almost 1,000 miles away. My Ohio gig is 120 miles from me. I can do 1/2 day hunts if I want.
For my arrangement, Ohio is a bargain.
If I had to give up hunting my home state in order to go to OH, it would be an easy decision for me. Go west young man.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk