I was inquiring as to Bill's intentions, not yours, as you mentioned them regarding Bill's oldest son. You mentioned that the son didn't know what Bill's intentions were or could care less what Bill wanted, so I asked, as what Bill wanted would have been in the original will. I think the son is being put in a bad light given the predicament he was placed in. It seems the son is getting the blame for the loss of the property or hunting rights, whereas from what has been presented, it was the judge who made the decision according to Arkansas law. It doesn't matter, based apparently on Arkansas law, if the son didn't have a relationship with his father for 20 years (which I would think would have been presented to the Judge). He was named the executor, and as a fiduciary he has the responsibility and obligation to maximize the value of the estate in a timely manner.
I also gave you my expectations, which are entirely consistent with what rambotogo stated above.
We feel for the loss of your hunting rights because it could happen to any of us that don't own property. You should feel blessed that you had 22 years hunting a good property. But even John Eberhart makes it work by knocking on doors for permission, hunting public lands, and hunting out of state. He doesn't own any land (other than his residence). His son Chris also wrote a book called "Whitetail Access" which is a good read.