• The SH Membership has gone live. Only SH Members have access to post in the classifieds. All members can view the classifieds. Starting in 2020 only SH Members will be admitted to the annual hunting contest. Current members will need to follow these steps to upgrade: 1. Click on your username 2. Click on Account upgrades 3. Choose SH Member and purchase.
  • We've been working hard the past few weeks to come up with some big changes to our vendor policies to meet the changing needs of our community. Please see the new vendor rules here: Vendor Access Area Rules

The Great Scent Control Debate

Re: RE: Re: The Great Scent Control Debate

loosanarrow said:
It took me three years of developing a routine that works for me - and it also required a significant expense in new clothes and hygiene products

Care to elaborate on this routine for those of us that are still experimenting?
 
Re: RE: Re: The Great Scent Control Debate

g2outdoors said:
loosanarrow said:
It took me three years of developing a routine that works for me - and it also required a significant expense in new clothes and hygiene products

Care to elaborate on this routine for those of us that are still experimenting?



I follow very closely the program John Eberhart lays out.

I do tend to take some extra precautions for my hair since I have long hair and hair is known to retain odors, especially oil based/carried odors. So my rule is that if I have not been doing daily scent control showers, I shower twice, the first shower I wash my hair twice, then let it dry completely before showering again right before going out. That is a big one, showering, drying thoroughly at least a couple hours, then showering again. I suspect it has to do with how oils distribute and saturate skin and hair. If you just wash well, there is enough oil down deep that it quickly resaturates the top of the skin or hair after the water dries up, then a second washing really strips it out and it takes longer for it to redistribute. Also, due to the way soap works, it is well known that washing and then drying will cause the second washing to go much deeper and clean much more thoroughly than multiple washes without drying between. I might be wrong, but that is my take on it. For morning hunts, I shower evening about hour before bed, and again in morning. But this double shower does not seem to be necessary if I am showering daily with scent control soaps, only if I have been off the routine for a day or two or gotten particularly sweaty.

I also keep my armpit hair shaved as close as beard trimmers will cut it, and I use scent free deodorant. My girlfriend helped me figure that out - I had just showered, and she said she could still smell my stanky pits, big mistake on her part. I started making her stuff her face in my pits and tell me if they stink. I could shower, dry off and 5 minutes later she could smell the funk if she put her nose right in it... I know, kinda gross, but she started it with the whole "I can still smell you" comment. So, in desperation, I decided to buzz of the pit hair. That did it. I had her do the sniff test after buying it and showering, and with a surprised look, she said "wow, I can't smell anything at all". Same with the head hair, she said I was not allowed to cut it, so she had to be my sniff tester as part of the deal. One shower would not do it, but letting it dry then showering again and she declared me to have no detectable odor in my mop. Just doing those two steps made a huge difference - I was immediately able to avoid detection in the urban zone, even without any scent control clothes, but was still raising some alarm in the wild woods at under about 50 to 75 yards. That was last year. This year, I got rid of all my old deer hunting clothes (after finding that I had a couple places I could smell something on a couple of them, smelled like maybe rancid cooking oil or something...), bought new long underwear, and a scentlok suit. Not sure what I could get away WITHOUT, but I can say with certainty that the whole package was a stunning success this year according the deer I hunt.

I also wash my rubber boot liners with hydrogen peroxide. They aren't removable on my most-used boots, so I just soak for an hour in peroxide then rinse, and dry on a boot dryer if I notice any odor at all when I stuff my face into them.

One more that I have not heard of anyone else doing, although I doubt I am the first - I carry a small bottle of hydrogen peroxide and I rinse my mouth out with it before I walk away from my vehicle to hunt. Try it out - wake up with "morning breath", rinse with peroxide, wait 5 minutes, ask your lady (oh wait, a lady would never do that :lol: ) to tell you how it worked. Also, after I eat anything,(which I typically only do once per sit) I wait about ten minutes and then rinse with peroxide and spit in my pee bottle. I also tend to not take any foods on stand that are not similar to natural woods stuff. I like nuts, raisins, plain crackers, fruits, that kind of stuff. No spicy or crazy smelling foods.

While hunting, I wear no clothes that have ever been street clothes. Everything is dedicated deer hunting clothes. Of course I keep them in airtight bins. I find that if I can smell something by stuffing it as far up my nostril as I can get it (LOL) deer can smell it from within 30 to 50 yards. If it is at all easily detected or stronger than barely noticeable, forget it, a deer will bust it at 100 yards or more. But I honestly do trust my (and my girl's) nose. I was able to locate the sources of several odors last year on hunting clothes I had been using for years, and that is how I discovered that there is a faintly detectable smell on my street clothes (yes, in the pits...) even after washing in scent control soap several times. It gets "stuck" or something. So I just went nuclear and have "separate everything" for deer hunting.

I am also a nuisance beaver trapper, and I was at the local fur buyer the other day learning to process otter skins since we have our first otter season this year and I caught my two otters a few weeks ago. Somehow we got on the subject of deer hunting, and then scent control. As trappers, we have a similar interest in odor and how it affects animals. Anyway, I told him of my success with not being winded this year, and what I was doing to accomplish that, and his reply was very similar to what woods89 might say - "I know two other guys who do all that s--t, and I think you guys are crazy. Ive killed a lot of deer smelling like a big armpit..." And I had to agree, so had I. it is entirely possible to kill plenty of deer without any scent control. But in my hunting journey, I am enjoying the results more than I dislike the hassle and expense. At least he didn't try to tell me that he did not believe me when I told him I had not been winded all year. And he certainly did not suggest that the deer just "got used to me". LOL.
 
Re: RE: Re: The Great Scent Control Debate

loosanarrow said:
At least he didn't try to tell me that he did not believe me when I told him I had not been winded all year. And he certainly did not suggest that the deer just "got used to me". LOL.

Well since I suggested that, lets talk about that. Many hunters, including John claim the deer in well managed areas like on TV catch human scent and get a free pass, so suffer no ill consequences from the encounter. Are those claims false, or are the deer getting used to those hunters? Can you get closer to urban deer than big woods deer? Why unless they get used to the human scent at those closer distances? Ever frequent habitat forums? Those guys spend a lot of time on their land, and the notion of deer getting used to their scent in not a fairy tale myth. The local park here, Kensington used to have a huge over population problem. The deer would walk right up to people. Did they not get used to those people? Now they have been shooting them for several years and good luck seeing any, let alone have them walk right up to you. How big is the area you are hunting, and how many "new" spots did you hunt this year?

Look feel free to do whatever you want, its your hunt. IF your telling me you can hunt the same tree day after day and still see mature deer, Im all ears.
 
Re: RE: Re: The Great Scent Control Debate

loosanarrow said:
woods89 said:
I really don't know what to think of the whole scent control thing, except for one thing. It simply overcomplicates hunting too much for me.

That might be different if I was hunting a small property. I can see working hard to minimize disturbance in that situation because you are sunk if the deer leave!

But when we're talking thousands of acres of woods and only hunting spots once a season it just seems impractical to me. Most places it would be impossible to get in without sweating a little.

Kudos to you if its your thing but I've found I'm happier if I just focus entirely on playing the wind. And I do get busted occasionally but I've never heard of anyone who didn't from time to time no matter what their routine.

I agree with what some have said about not knowing exactly what's going on downwind. I try to think of wind like a creek. It flows in one direction but every disturbance has an effect. And sometimes those disturbances can be your best friend!

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

I definitely get where you are coming from. It is a lot of hassle, and I never used any of it until 3 years ago and I have always been able to take deer almost at will.

I have now been winded this season because I just did not have time (or discipline..) to get it all together one recent evening and I was after the first doe to offer a shot - none did before a yearling passed downwind and you know the rest... except maybe the part about this particular little doe being determined to use the opportunity to hone and perfect her snorting and stomping technique for at least a couple of minutes straight. LOL. I finally started waving at her. That got her moving along.

John Eberhart writes that scent control is the most important innovation for archers since the compound bow. I disagree. I think it is more important than that. At least it is for me. I hunt with longbows mostly, and although I have taken many deer with a compound, I much prefer a simple, durable, shoots the same after 20 years, traditional archery kit. But my archery kit choice has nothing to do with being anti-technology. It's more about what I enjoy shooting. Much like you enjoy playing the wind, woods89. All of that said, I am little nervous to disagree with John (LOL), but different perspectives will always the same thing a little differently.

My reasons for being so obsessed with scent control (most of the time) are several, all of which together make the results worth the extra effort for me.
- Obviously, when hunting antler, one must often get the does past without alarming them. This usually means they are downwind at some point, ALMOST always before mature bucks are in archery range - 25 yards for me.
- Allows me to hunt places I would not have even considered due to swirling winds
- I can hunt small properties with much less disturbance to the deer, keeping them around longer. That said, entry and exit routes are the critical factor after you get scent under control
- The biggest one for me, but the one I would have thought least likely when I started cleaning my scent up 3 years ago, is that I love to watch deer. This past season has been my best ever, like by far, in terms of just watching deer go about the odd business of being deer. I many times had up to 10 deer in sight at once, up to 4 bucks at once, and I was able to regularly watch behavior that I had only witnessed rarely before. I would not say I saw anything completely new to me, but I watched half a dozen trees be shredded by decent bucks this year, and that equals about as many as the past 10 years combined. It is tough to find the right words, but not having deer alarmed by my smell has just made my time in the deer stand more enjoyable.

I say above "not having deer alarmed by my smell" only because so many doubters will say "you can't eliminate odor completely". I really don't know if you can eliminate it completely or not, don't even care. But I care if deer are alarmed by smelling the air downwind of me, and I am taking the time to type this all out because I am one regular hunter, who fancy's myself to know how to kill deer (aka Joe Blow...), who just went an entire season without being winded while practicing scent control. I doubted it too until I did it, although I did have to trust some folks who told me it could be done when I first started trying, because I had my doubts too.

Woods89, I totally respect your take on it. I may one day get tired of the complicated effort and logistics required to be scent free (oh sorry - I meant undetected by deer's noses)... My goal is not to get anyone else to do it, I am just trying to help out the folks who, like me, might find the benefits to be worth the hassle, and, like I did, are hearing that it is not possible. Make no mistake, a human can achieve "completely undetected by deer's noses". It took me three years of developing a routine that works for me - and it also required a significant expense in new clothes and hygiene products, and it took trusting a few scent control advocates who assured me they were not being winded. Now if a deer smells me, I know something is wrong or I am not even trying that day. And for over 30 years I was winded many many times in a year. For myself and others who have gone through this notable change in deer's reactions, the subject is no longer open for debate. It works, and if you don't THINK it does, you are wrong because I just did it.
Now "is it worth it"...? That is a completely different question - one without a factual answer. And I respect the "no"s as much as the "yes"s.
This post makes more sense to me than any other in this thread. You just expressed what I believe and then some.

I, too, hunt small property and find that the"hassle" pays off. I'm obviously not as thorough as you must be because I've still been busted a couple times this year. But when I make a noticeable effort, it usually pays with more deer in sight for longer periods of time. I've hunted straight away after work a few times, hunted while sick and sweating my butt off (when even the most careful preparations weren't enough) so I certainly have seen the difference. Next year, I'm upping my game in scent control and plan to be more diligent in every hunt.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
 
Maybe I should clarify a bit. I don't want to come off as the guy who is like " I don't so it doesn't work."

IF I was hunting 200 acres close to my house my strategy would look a lot different. I'd have to hunt my good spots multiple times every season and I DO believe residual scent will quickly make those spots ineffective. If I got busted I could be pushing one of a small number of resident bucks off of the property and seriously hurting my chances of killing one. I wouldn't have the freedom of going and hunting a different group of deer like I do.

But I'm dealing thousands of acres of public hardwoods and a very low deer density. I'm often looking for one or two deer sightings a day so I don't have numbers of deer getting downwind of me regularly. I'm also hunting steep hill country so almost without exception my spots are chosen in areas that move deer off of the path with optimum wind( for them). And since I'm 100% mobile and not hunting these spots more than once a year I have the element of surprise.

The tradeoff is that most off these spots have a long walk in at a minimum. Some of them are best hunted by spike camping overnight. I killed three deer this year. One was 600 yds from the truck and the other two were between 1.5-2 miles. Care to share with me the logistics of staying scent free after packing in with 50 lbs, cooking on an isobutane stove, and sleeping in a sleeping bag?

That's why for me I choose not to. Put me in the first scenario and I can guarantee I'm gonna be looking at taking some steps towards scent reduction. And I could probably hunt closer to the road out of presets if I would dive into the process. But I've found that I'd rather hike and camp than shower and spray. For me it comes down to having fun hunting more than gaining every edge I can.

So I'm not trying to minimize you guys who do this. In all honesty we won't come to perfect consensus on this one. It's just a matter of examining your situation and deciding if its in your best interest.

This and the thread on the other forum have made for interesting reading.


Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
This is a thread for those who want to debate scent control technology and scent control routines and whether they work or do not work. We should leave the activated carbon thread alone for fear of tragically derailing it.

Feel free to debate your heart out using whatever scientific, anecdotal, objective, or subjective evidence you have or do not have... heck It can be outright heresay if that's your thing!

For those of us who are for scent control technology:
What is your reasoning? Do you have scientific data to prove it's effectiveness? Or simply anecdotal evidence based off your time in the field?

For those against scent control technology:
Most of us are aware of the wholly unscientific "field & stream" tests done using tracking dogs but what other evidence do you have that is does not work? Can you provide a scientific test with controlled variables to confirm that it does not work? Or are you just in the camp that, "you just can't fool a deers nose" ? Or is there another reason?

And..... go!



Regards,
d_rek

And .... go !! Lmao !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I read a book years back by Dr. James Kroll. He spoke about managing a property where they spent several seasons focusing on reducing doe numbers and taking no bucks. After a few seasons of this, the does avoided the fields and bucks would wander in. It seemed that there was a reversal of activity and it seemed to correlate with pressure.
 
Back
Top