Do they? Exactly as you have it worded here? Exact wording matters quite a bit....and IIRC madrock warns that a knot on the brake side can actually impair the safeguard's ability to catch the rope in the event of a fall?
I was referencing this thread: https://saddlehunter.com/community/...rom-mad-rock-safeguard-paperwork.32633/page-2Do they? Exactly as you have it worded here? Exact wording matters quite a bit.
Read post #16 above. This seems to be the most troublesome/misunderstood aspect that has affected all these debates we keep having about the device.
The directions says you can break the safeguard if it hits a knot or another device on the brake lineDo they? Exactly as you have it worded here? Exact wording matters quite a bit.
Read post #16 above. This seems to be the most troublesome/misunderstood aspect that has affected all these debates we keep having about the device.
The "safety police" among us might overplay some of the concerns in these debates, but they get the part right about random untrained people spreading incorrect information on the interweb. Myself included. I probably shouldn't be saying anything, but alas...here I am.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
I, of all people know this….being in the fire department, we use gloves for everything….Another note (not to echo anything that has been said), if I'm handling rope friction, I'm personally wearing light weight leather gloves.
If the Safeguard has hit the stopper knot the slipping has already occurred, and the stopper kept you from going to the ground.since we're all here learning... I run the madrock safeguard and while I have a scaffold knot at the end of my 40ft tether, that still leaves ample line for me to fall to the ground at hanging height (usually 18' or so)
I have not thought that the madrock safeguard requires a back-up stopper knot on the brake line - not that such a knot is unsafe, but the safeguard has always appeared to bite the rope well, and IIRC madrock warns that a knot on the brake side can actually impair the safeguard's ability to catch the rope in the event of a fall?
To reply to all questions asked, which hopefully covers what i can see/remember
Canyon elite 9mm is the rope i am running (debating on switching back to my old rope)
I mean, i didn’t plan to use it as a brake “hands free” but i guess that’s what i get for falling
Somebody said the GriGri+ can be loaded 2 different ways? I followed to pictures, made sure my rope was in the correct way.
At the end of the day, i may be going back to carrying a few sticks in and using my lineman belt and tether at the top of the tree for a little while.
I was able to “reenact” the situation here at my house ground level. The GriGri is not like the MadRock meaning if you introduce slack, you will regret it instantly
I one stick, using the Tethrd one stick. When i say “sat back” meaning i was going to make my move up the tree more…In your original post, you said you “went to sit back to get my step…..when i sat back, i kept going”
Did you have your hand on the brake line when you sat back? That’s what I mean that it’s not intended to be hands free. There must be tension on the brake line for it to engage reliably, either by your hand or a friction hitch “third hand”.
This is all clearly laid out in Petzl’s documentation. I’m glad you didn’t get seriously injured and I hope it’s a wake up call to folks here to always read the manufacturer’s documentation on any device you trust your life to. And if going outside the manufacturer recommendations, you assume additional risk and better know exactly what you’re doing.
When you stand up to move the tether up the tree is when slack gets introduced to the system. If you didnt grab the tail end of the rope and pull it up to get the device tensioned after the move, the grigri could of slipped down on you.I one stick, using the Tethrd one stick. When i say “sat back” meaning i was going to make my move up the tree more…
I had tension and was locked and not moving. when i went to lift my stick with my foot, i began to fall. My right hand was on my hip (which is my brake hand), and when i lifted the stick i began to fall…..so that is why i am wondering if i introduced slack in the system
Reaction was grab…results were pictured
Ya, I'm not helping. I apologize for adding confusion.I was referencing this thread: https://saddlehunter.com/community/...rom-mad-rock-safeguard-paperwork.32633/page-2
now I'm just confused. can someone plainly tell me if I need to have a stopper knot on the brake side of the safeguard for saddle hunting safety??
Yup. I'm conflating written words included in the directions with alleged emailed words to a member here. Totally what I myself was saying about random untrained people spreading misunderstanding.The directions says you can break the safeguard if it hits a knot or another device on the brake line
Yes, there is a possibility in case of a dynamic load the cam of the Safeguard us disengaged because of a stopper knot.since we're all here learning... I run the madrock safeguard and while I have a scaffold knot at the end of my 40ft tether, that still leaves ample line for me to fall to the ground at hanging height (usually 18' or so)
I have not thought that the madrock safeguard requires a back-up stopper knot on the brake line - not that such a knot is unsafe, but the safeguard has always appeared to bite the rope well, and IIRC madrock warns that a knot on the brake side can actually impair the safeguard's ability to catch the rope in the event of a fall?
Thank you for re-posting that email. Sorry about the use of the word alleged. I'm fumbling all my thoughts and words today it seems. It was the wrong word to try and draw a distinction between directions and other sources of information.
You’re absolutely right about being critical about the source. I didn’t need to be so touchy about it.Thank you for re-posting that email. Sorry about the use of the word alleged. I'm fumbling all my thoughts and words today it seems. It was the wrong word to try and draw a distinction between directions and other sources of information.
In doing so I wasn't trying to advocate against the information you are sharing. As noted, your info is what I personally want to hear. Just acknowledging the difference between printed directions for widespread dissemination and electronic communications between individuals. It felt only fair to draw such a distinction, especially on a growing public forum.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk