• The SH Membership has gone live. Only SH Members have access to post in the classifieds. All members can view the classifieds. Starting in 2020 only SH Members will be admitted to the annual hunting contest. Current members will need to follow these steps to upgrade: 1. Click on your username 2. Click on Account upgrades 3. Choose SH Member and purchase.
  • We've been working hard the past few weeks to come up with some big changes to our vendor policies to meet the changing needs of our community. Please see the new vendor rules here: Vendor Access Area Rules

Is it just me or are these saddle companies largely "silent" about fall testing?

New guy here. So I was considering buying a rock climbing harness to serve as my safety harness when using my hang on stand, but then I started investigating saddle hunting. The more research that I did, the more I wanted to try it. But there is a safety issue that I'm trying to get a clear answer on, and that is concerning "fall safety" of a saddle.

I get that the purpose of a saddle is to prevent a fall from happening in the first place, but I will appeal to Murphy's law, that if there is a chance of falling due to human error, someone is going to fall. And if that idiot happens to me, I want my saddle to be thoroughly "fall tested." The problem I had when investigating these saddle companies is that they were largely silent about any sort of "fall testing."

Now, of course, these guys fall tested these harnesses, but I'm having a heck of a time finding clear and concise info about such testing. Either I'm just not finding this valuable info or I'm assuming there is a liability issue here, and that these guys don't want to be responsible in the event that someone does fall wearing their saddle and the saddle fails to stop the fall. Thus, the company will say, "Well... the saddle was not designed to serve as a fall protection device in the first place."

To this end, if these saddles are fall rated and tested, then why aren't they advertising them as being an effective safety device that will stop a fall, in the event of a stupid mistake? And if they are thoroughly fall tested, why are there some guys still wearing a RC harness while saddle hunting?
If guys use a Sit drag witch is not made to be use off the ground then guys will use a rock harness . I don't know any saddle hunter using a manufactured saddle from a company that is actually a saddle intended for saddle hunting using a rock harness with it.
 
I went with an Aerohunter saddle because of their company history. I'm assuming they KNOW how to make arborist gear, and thus, a hunting saddle. They've been doing it for years and have a more perspective than some other companies. Their saddles are built like tanks. Without some sort of independent testing or certification process, I'm betting on them. I think Tethrd and Trooghyline are similar. I'll really admit, I'm not so sure about the rest of these companies.

Yes. Saddle hunting is a risk. We accept the risk of driving our cars, using weapons, and climbing trees. I'd rather minimize the risk (real or just perceived) of a saddle failure. There's nothing wrong with that. With all that can go wrong, that's one less thing I'll worry about.
 
I went with an Aerohunter saddle because of their company history. I'm assuming they KNOW how to make arborist gear, and thus, a hunting saddle. They've been doing it for years and have a more perspective than some other companies. Their saddles are built like tanks. Without some sort of independent testing or certification process, I'm betting on them. I think Tethrd and Trooghyline are similar. I'll really admit, I'm not so sure about the rest of these companies.

Yes. Saddle hunting is a risk. We accept the risk of driving our cars, using weapons, and climbing trees. I'd rather minimize the risk (real or just perceived) of a saddle failure. There's nothing wrong with that. With all that can go wrong, that's one less thing I'll worry about.

The New Tribes products are very well built. So is the Cruzr and TX 5 or the method or H2. Just as good as Tethrd and maybe equal to New Tribes. I have never tried a trophy line


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Last edited:
Most saddle makers are doing some form of strength testing, but not specifically a fall test. I have said this before and will continue, but I want my equipment to fail just a little before it reaches the point my spine snaps. Your spine will be gone way before the beloved 24kN the safety police like to quote here and I would rather take my chances on the fall to the ground than become paralyzed.

For TMA testing, I quote their own words (and if anyone cares to use the search feature, this topic has already been beat to death too, but I know you won't, so here we go :) - "Treestand Manufacturer’s Association (TMA), industry standards for treestands and treestand harnesses were developed and approved by members of the association. The association’s bylaws require that members in the Manufacturing Class submit products to a third party testing firm and certified by that testing firm to meet or exceed industry standards recognized by TMA. TMA members have voted and approved eleven (11) Treestand Manufacturing Standards (TMS)".

This translates in redneck to the members made their own rules, or in other words, the inmates are running the asylum. They are tied now to the ASTM, which has some merit, but like any regulations, they can be manipulated by keeping either too narrow or too wide a focus. Saddles aside, there are many treestands on the market today that are not TMA affiliated that are stronger and better than many that are, so TMA doesn't equal quality nor absolute safety.

The best policy for anyone too concerned is to keep your a$$ on the ground and then you only have to worry about tripping and falling on a beaver cut sapling and impaling yourself!

I'm not a member of the safety police union, but I do have a fun police badge. We're kind of the same thing.

The ratings on climbing gear are based on two assumptions: There's a threshold for margin of error that once you're above it, the odds of something breaking are almost zero. And second, it's implied you're properly trained and certified to use the equipment, so the power of the first assumption is magnified by you staying within known operating parameters.

Most casual consumers of climbing gear, specifically hunters, make the assumption that if the gear carries a strength rating, doing things within that rating aren't dangerous. They not only reduce the effectiveness of strength ratings, like you said - they may even create scenarios where the strength of the climbing equipment becomes the actual risk factor.

You're very right Sir!

This next part is not directed at you @Bwhana !

I firmly support separating "climbing a tree" from "saddle hunting". The "I got my saddle, what climbing method do you recommend?" Line of thinking is very dangerous. Saddle companies are making an assumption - Our product is designed to hold you under constant tension, on properly rated ropes/hardware. They do drop tests, and strength ratings on the equipment to reduce liability insurance costs, and make it more difficult to litigate against them in an injury case. THEY DO NOT DO DROP TESTS, STRENGTH TESTS, CERTIFICATIONS, TMA, ETC. FOR YOUR WELL BEING. I REPEAT - TESTING IS NOT DONE FOR YOU. Because people conflate using a saddle to hunt, and how they climb a tree, people are going to die. A saddle is designed to hold your butt at height under tension. That's it. ITS GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH CLIMBING A TREE.

If you want equipment designed to help you safely climb a tree - There's plenty out there. New Tribe has built an entire business around the industry. If you're not using properly rated arborist and climbing equipment, and you're not trained properly by properly certified climbing instructors, you're introducing a large amount of risk into your hunting activities. I'm not pooping on the parade - I climb trees too. But it is very important to understand that YOU are assuming ALL of that risk - you will not win any consolation prizes, cash awards, nothing from a saddle company if you hurt yourself climbing a tree. And I think that's important. People see 24kn rating, tma approved, "everybody's doing it", etc. and they convince themselves that it's not likely that something bad will happen, and its not their responsibility if it does. This is wrong.

It bears repeating - climbing trees is dangerous. It is still dangerous if you have a strong piece of fabric planted on your backside. It is still dangerous if you use a lineman's belt. Or your tether. It's dangerous if you use super rigid steel climbing sticks or steps or ladders that don't flex or have been tested to high heaven to hold up a truck. It's dangerous when you're 2 feet off the ground, or 20 feet in the air. It's dangerous if you practice. It's dangerous if conditions are perfect. It's dangerous.

Get the notion out of your head that hanging from a rope in a tree, and climbing a tree, are related in ANY way in regards to risk. And get the notion out of your head that the numbers and letters stamped on the side of your equipment mean anything if you're not properly trained and your gear properly vetted for climbing trees.
 
I'm not a member of the safety police union, but I do have a fun police badge. We're kind of the same thing.

The ratings on climbing gear are based on two assumptions: There's a threshold for margin of error that once you're above it, the odds of something breaking are almost zero. And second, it's implied you're properly trained and certified to use the equipment, so the power of the first assumption is magnified by you staying within known operating parameters.

Most casual consumers of climbing gear, specifically hunters, make the assumption that if the gear carries a strength rating, doing things within that rating aren't dangerous. They not only reduce the effectiveness of strength ratings, like you said - they may even create scenarios where the strength of the climbing equipment becomes the actual risk factor.

You're very right Sir!

This next part is not directed at you @Bwhana !

I firmly support separating "climbing a tree" from "saddle hunting". The "I got my saddle, what climbing method do you recommend?" Line of thinking is very dangerous. Saddle companies are making an assumption - Our product is designed to hold you under constant tension, on properly rated ropes/hardware. They do drop tests, and strength ratings on the equipment to reduce liability insurance costs, and make it more difficult to litigate against them in an injury case. THEY DO NOT DO DROP TESTS, STRENGTH TESTS, CERTIFICATIONS, TMA, ETC. FOR YOUR WELL BEING. I REPEAT - TESTING IS NOT DONE FOR YOU. Because people conflate using a saddle to hunt, and how they climb a tree, people are going to die. A saddle is designed to hold your butt at height under tension. That's it. ITS GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH CLIMBING A TREE.

If you want equipment designed to help you safely climb a tree - There's plenty out there. New Tribe has built an entire business around the industry. If you're not using properly rated arborist and climbing equipment, and you're not trained properly by properly certified climbing instructors, you're introducing a large amount of risk into your hunting activities. I'm not pooping on the parade - I climb trees too. But it is very important to understand that YOU are assuming ALL of that risk - you will not win any consolation prizes, cash awards, nothing from a saddle company if you hurt yourself climbing a tree. And I think that's important. People see 24kn rating, tma approved, "everybody's doing it", etc. and they convince themselves that it's not likely that something bad will happen, and its not their responsibility if it does. This is wrong.

It bears repeating - climbing trees is dangerous. It is still dangerous if you have a strong piece of fabric planted on your backside. It is still dangerous if you use a lineman's belt. Or your tether. It's dangerous if you use super rigid steel climbing sticks or steps or ladders that don't flex or have been tested to high heaven to hold up a truck. It's dangerous when you're 2 feet off the ground, or 20 feet in the air. It's dangerous if you practice. It's dangerous if conditions are perfect. It's dangerous.

Get the notion out of your head that hanging from a rope in a tree, and climbing a tree, are related in ANY way in regards to risk. And get the notion out of your head that the numbers and letters stamped on the side of your equipment mean anything if you're not properly trained and your gear properly vetted for climbing trees.

Totally agree but driving a car is dangerous. Especially in a blizzard.
Eating too much is dangerous.
Climbing is dangerous. Using a gun or crossbow is dangerous. Sex can be dangerous.
What can we do to reduce risk. We will never eliminate it.
And saddle testing is mostly marketing and litigation protection and not super meaningful.
Look at the saddle, purely subjective but? How is the stitching
How heavy is the webbing
How good are the buckles
Are the lineman’s loops thin and weak looking and how are they attached to the saddle.
What rope is used on the bridge. How is it attached to the saddle.
The webbing on the kestrel and my TX5 are heavy duty.
Look at the lineman’s loops on the H2, heavy duty?
Look at the waist belt on the mantis. Flimsy
Saddles vary. But I still trust the build on all of them if I check them daily and use them properly.
If I hurt myself it will be user error more than likely

And yes new tribes makes the best built saddle but a TX5 looks just as good. IMO
Do they market them based on the fact they might be tested no.

Tethrd likes to bring up testing for marketing purposes. Personally and subjectively some other saddles look to be better built. Will they protect me if I have slack in my tether. No.
My back will break or my rope man1 will cut my tether before my saddle breaks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Last edited:
Comparison

My Tx5 compared to a mantis
Tx5. Heavier. Over 16 oz
TX5
Heavier wider thick stronger better webbing, stitching, leg buckles, lineman’s loops, waist belt, bridge loops and at the cost of 16 oz.
But the flimsy mantis is tested and I believe safe

The untested TX5. Safer in my opinion
Any New Tribe product is also heavier and safer IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
StacheNGuns, post: 414635, member: 15310"]

Original post

Question


New guy here. So I was considering buying a rock climbing harness to serve as my safety harness when using my hang on stand, but then I started investigating saddle hunting. The more research that I did, the more I wanted to try it. But there is a safety issue that I'm trying to get a clear answer on, and that is concerning "fall safety" of a saddle.

I get that the purpose of a saddle is to prevent a fall from happening in the first place, but I will appeal to Murphy's law, that if there is a chance of falling due to human error, someone is going to fall. And if that idiot happens to me, I want my saddle to be thoroughly "fall tested." The problem I had when investigating these saddle companies is that they were largely silent about any sort of "fall testing."

Answer
Does any harness prevent a fall in the first place.
Will a rock climbing harness protect your body more than a kestrel in a fall over 1 foot?

Question

Now, of course, these guys fall tested these harnesses, but I'm having a heck of a time finding clear and concise info about such testing. Either I'm just not finding this valuable info or I'm assuming there is a liability issue here, and that these guys don't want to be responsible in the event that someone does fall wearing their saddle and the saddle fails to stop the fall. Thus, the company will say, "Well... the saddle was not designed to serve as a fall protection device in the first place."


Answer.

I would be just as concerned about any thing over a one foot fall in a rock climbing harness or a saddle.

Question

To this end, if these saddles are fall rated and tested, then why aren't they advertising them as being an effective safety device that will stop a fall, in the event of a stupid mistake?


Answer

Is stopping the fall an issue or the stops effects on the body


Question

And if they are thoroughly fall tested, why are there some guys still wearing a RC harness while saddle hunting?

Answer

Most only wear a rock climbing harness when using a sit drag or fleece saddle




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
If guys use a Sit drag witch is not made to be use off the ground then guys will use a rock harness . I don't know any saddle hunter using a manufactured saddle from a company that is actually a saddle intended for saddle hunting using a rock harness with it.

I don't know any guys personally using a RC harness with it either, but as I've gotten sucked down the internet rabbit hole regarding "saddlehunting safety," I've come across at least a couple guys who stated that they used some type of RC harness as a backup. So, to correct my own thinking, I suppose this choice is less about the RC harness being thoroughly fall tested, but more so, that a RC harness is cheaper than buying another saddle for redundancy?

Personally, I'm a bit of a risk taker by nature, as I suppose most of this saddle hunting community is... but I also like to be well informed about my equipment before I start hanging from a tether on a tree. And it seems that most saddle hunters, if not all, feel pretty dang confident when it comes to their safety. Great info coming out of this thread for sure.
 
StacheNGuns, post: 414635, member: 15310"]

Original post

Question


New guy here. So I was considering buying a rock climbing harness to serve as my safety harness when using my hang on stand, but then I started investigating saddle hunting. The more research that I did, the more I wanted to try it. But there is a safety issue that I'm trying to get a clear answer on, and that is concerning "fall safety" of a saddle.

I get that the purpose of a saddle is to prevent a fall from happening in the first place, but I will appeal to Murphy's law, that if there is a chance of falling due to human error, someone is going to fall. And if that idiot happens to me, I want my saddle to be thoroughly "fall tested." The problem I had when investigating these saddle companies is that they were largely silent about any sort of "fall testing."

Answer

Will a rock climbing harness protect your body more than a kestrel in a fall over 1 foot?

Question

Now, of course, these guys fall tested these harnesses, but I'm having a heck of a time finding clear and concise info about such testing. Either I'm just not finding this valuable info or I'm assuming there is a liability issue here, and that these guys don't want to be responsible in the event that someone does fall wearing their saddle and the saddle fails to stop the fall. Thus, the company will say, "Well... the saddle was not designed to serve as a fall protection device in the first place."


Answer.

I would be just as concerned about any thing over a one foot fall in a Rick climbing harness or a saddle.

Question

To this end, if these saddles are fall rated and tested, then why aren't they advertising them as being an effective safety device that will stop a fall, in the event of a stupid mistake?


Answer

Is stopping the fall an issue or the stops effects on the body


Question

And if they are thoroughly fall tested, why are there some guys still wearing a RC harness while saddle hunting?

Answer

Most only wear a rock climbing harness when using a sit drag or fleece saddle




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Good stuff, but here's my question.... Does this community know -- at what distance from a fall from a static system
(while being harnessed) before the body is critically injured?
 
Totally agree with what's been said. In regards to saddles, I don't know what's strong enough and won't fail. I don't know if the webbing is stitched right, using the right thread, and not too much stitching that weakens the saddle, etc. I'm a biologist, not an engineer or a seamstress. I do know that when I strap that saddle on my butt and I'm trusting it with my life, I don't wanna hear a pop and suddenly be free falling to the ground or getting impaled by a step. It's not unreasonable to want to see some testing to give me peace of mind. I think that's what everyone wants and gets at the original poster's comments.
 
Good stuff, but here's my question.... Does this community know -- at what distance from a fall from a static system
(while being harnessed) before the body is critically injured?

Good stuff, but here's my question.... Does this community know -- at what distance from a fall from a static system
(while being harnessed) before the body is critically injured?

@StacheNGuns - take a look here:

Calculating fall force with slack in tether

And here:


Knowing maximum fall arresting force that's permissible without getting hurt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Good stuff, but here's my question.... Does this community know -- at what distance from a fall from a static system
(while being harnessed) before the body is critically injured?

Not far but how you fall and land has an effect. Are you slowing the fall or it a straight drop. Here is a video with a long fall but on a dynamic rope
Not all falls are the same. I am going to use a screamer on my tether this year. I expect my arms or legs might reduce a falls effects but get scrapped up. There are posts elsewhere suggesting a short fall can cause very serious damage to the body




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
Last edited:
Not far but how you fall and land has an effect. Are you slowing the fall or it a straight drop. Here is a video with a long fall but on a dynamic rope
Not all falls are the same. I am going to use a screamer on my tether this year. I expect my arms or legs might reduce a falls effects but get scrapped up. There are posts elsewhere suggesting a short fall can cause very serious damage to the body




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
This really seems like the safest method. Where can I pick up a trained belayer like the one shown in this video. Do they just fit in your pack or do they follow you in? What do you do with them once you're in the tree? Are they scent free? Do you have to feed them? How do you get their attention in the dark when you are ready to come down? I'd like to not have to yell "falling" at the end of each hunt. I have so many questions.
 
The last 2 accidents I heard of were both tied webbing bridges coming untied. I would worry more about that. Saddles are very strong and slipping out and falling would be more likely than tearing to failure.
I was thinking about going to a tied webbing bridge on my Kite (stock rope bridge is crazy bulky) but decided not to after seeing a post on FB. I suddenly remembered why I was never completely comfortable with that bridge on my sit-drag (slippage) but at least then I had my rock climbing harness, too.

I've seen a few videos on FB of people marketing their new company's saddle for sale. I wouldn't trust my life to one or two, based solely on their videos and how the tester/maker of the saddle looks. Probably wrong and I'm not proud of it, but it's me hanging from the thing...
 
Not far but how you fall and land has an effect. Are you slowing the fall or it a straight drop. Here is a video with a long fall but on a dynamic rope
Not all falls are the same. I am going to use a screamer on my tether this year. I expect my arms or legs might reduce a falls effects but get scrapped up. There are posts elsewhere suggesting a short fall can cause very serious damage to the body

As @Ontariofarmer said - "I am going to use a screamer on my tether this year." :)

Saddlehunters should look into using an energy absorbing device like a stitched screamer or a Kong KISA which will greatly reduce the maximum arresting force (jolt) to which you are subjected when you fall. Even when using an energy absorber, you still have to be mindful of hazards like platform edges, steps, sticks, bolts, protruding broken branches, etc., all of which can impale you during a fall if you aren't careful.
 

This site talks about "Fall Factors." And how a fall factor of 2 will likely cause injury. This means that if I had a 2 foot tether line and climbed 2 feet above the anchor point and just let go, I'd be at risk of injury (4 foot fall/ 2 foot rope length = Fall factor of 2). Idk about you guys, but this example seems very counter intuitive to me, being that the rope length is so short. Just makes me think.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking about going to a tied webbing bridge on my Kite (stock rope bridge is crazy bulky) but decided not to after seeing a post on FB. I suddenly remembered why I was never completely comfortable with that bridge on my sit-drag (slippage) but at least then I had my rock climbing harness, too.

I've seen a few videos on FB of people marketing their new company's saddle for sale. I wouldn't trust my life to one or two, based solely on their videos and how the tester/maker of the saddle looks. Probably wrong and I'm not proud of it, but it's me hanging from the thing...
Before I used a tied webbing bridge I sewed the tags ends down to the standing part. Not noticing they are coming partially untied would be bad. I have since gone to climbing slings. They are just as light and fully tested.
 

This site talks about "Fall Factors." And how a fall factor of 2 will likely cause injury. This means that if I had a 2 foot tether line and climbed 2 feet above the anchor point and just let go, I'd be at risk of injury (4 foot fall/ 2 foot rope length = Fall factor of 2). Idk about you guys, but this example seems very counter intuitive to me, being that the rope length is so short. Just makes me think.

Seems like most one sticking with aiders that I see on Youtube is not too far off from this.
 
Back
Top