• The SH Membership has gone live. Only SH Members have access to post in the classifieds. All members can view the classifieds. Starting in 2020 only SH Members will be admitted to the annual hunting contest. Current members will need to follow these steps to upgrade: 1. Click on your username 2. Click on Account upgrades 3. Choose SH Member and purchase.
  • We've been working hard the past few weeks to come up with some big changes to our vendor policies to meet the changing needs of our community. Please see the new vendor rules here: Vendor Access Area Rules

Muzzleloader - No exit wound/little blood

ScottL

Active Member
SH Member
Dec 18, 2019
129
228
43
36
Starke Florida
YAHOO
scottstreestand@yahoo.com
AOL
scottstreestand@yahoo.com
LOCATION
Florida
I shot powerbelt bullets with 100gr of triple 7 pellets for several years and either they dropped right there or you had to get a tracking dog. I switched to the shockwave bullet and was very happy till the last 2 deer I killed with them. I shot about 10 all with pass throughs, but due to shot angles I recovered the last 2 from deer that didn't pass through and neither of the bullets expanded. I have pics of one ill try to find. So I changed to the hornady xtp 245 gr and so far so good, great expansion and nice blood trails.
 

BuckTown

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2019
378
454
63
Central VA
I went from Powerbelts to T/C Shockwave sabots. Only had one buck with the Powerbelts that was a tough track and he was @ 15 yards (not ideal for expansion I’m guessing). Consistency at 100yds was my main issue with the Powerbelts. But the T/C Shockwave have done a great job, consistent and great blood trails, and a few drops without need to track.
 

ScottL

Active Member
SH Member
Dec 18, 2019
129
228
43
36
Starke Florida
YAHOO
scottstreestand@yahoo.com
AOL
scottstreestand@yahoo.com
LOCATION
Florida
Shock wave 245 or 250gr can't remember with 2 50gr 777 pellets. Shot was 30yrds.
 

Attachments

  • Resized_Resized_20221011_160441.jpeg
    Resized_Resized_20221011_160441.jpeg
    182 KB · Views: 13
  • Resized_Resized_Resized_20221011_160433.jpeg
    Resized_Resized_Resized_20221011_160433.jpeg
    181.2 KB · Views: 13

Lucky13

Active Member
Jun 29, 2022
194
364
63
53
I shoot heavier bullets and stay away from pellets.
The best combo I've found is Barnes 50 cal 290 grain T-EZ with 110 volumetric measurement of Blackhorn 209. The heavier bullets are hammers and if they do run they drop within sight but usually it's just lights out.
This pic is from a buck I shot on muzzle opener. It was a passthru and the exit hole was probably a tad smaller than a golfball. Obviously heart shots with any weapon they don't go far but there's some value to sending heavy bullets. Not all shots are heart shots but devastation they deliver is a show stopper pretty much where ever you hit them. Accuracy is excellent with those bullets too. I run iron sights and have killed everything I've pointed it at out to 115 yards. Where I hunt that's as long of shot as I'd take. Most are under 70 yards but as close as 15.
In my opinion. pellets seem to be more sensitive to moisture. Maybe I'm wrong but I stick to pouring propellant down my barrel, getting the exact amount my rifle likes shooting heavy lead, and had zero issues.
IMG_2650.jpg

IMG_2660.jpg
 

philsanchez76

Well-Known Member
SH Member
May 20, 2019
1,385
2,022
113
43
TN
im glad you found him man! Every year there's tons of people that make great shots but Never find their deer with muzzleloaders. I switched to a smokeless muzzleloader for this reason. The areas I hunt are muzzleloader only so I cant use a rifle anyway. I can now shoot projectiles at rifle speeds. A lot less problems.
 

CZMark

Well-Known Member
SH Member
Sep 21, 2018
1,551
2,266
113
65
Foggy Bog, WI
I shoot traditional muzzle loaders with blackpowder and roundballs (mostly 54 cal.). Non-pass-throughs are the norm, along with poor blood trails. I commonly find a flattened roundball against the skin on the far side of the deer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nosaj

BuffaloBill

Well-Known Member
SH Member
Jan 20, 2019
1,442
2,191
113
36
Indiana
I’d dump the Powerbelts. I use Harvester bullets and sabots. Specifically the 300gr White Lightning. That with 110 grains of BH209 puts a thump on them. I’ve had holes touching at 100 yards.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigterp

kbetts

Well-Known Member
SH Member
Oct 13, 2015
1,873
2,937
113
Delaware
LOCATION
Delaware
I’m using loose powder.. measured with a scale. I’m hearing lots of bad things about the powerbelts.. maybe next season ill switch out..

Measured with a scale? Black powder is a volume measurement unless you move to smokeless.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
 

redsquirrel

Administrator
Staff member
SH Member
Feb 19, 2014
14,966
20,221
113
NJ
WEBSITE
saddlehunter.com
Measured with a scale? Black powder is a volume measurement unless you move to smokeless.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
That led to a fun google search for me:
 

krub6b

Well-Known Member
SH Member
Sep 5, 2019
1,150
1,762
113
37
Missouri
Boy I haven't been on huntingnet in a hot minute. That's a great read though, depending on how you fill your volumetric measure you can get some big variances in load weight leading to inconsistent accuracy. weighing your charges out is better, but you have to determine what weight you are looking for first.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

Bigterp

Moderator
Staff member
SH Member
Sep 11, 2017
7,033
12,429
113
49
Baltimore, Maryland
Measured with a scale? Black powder is a volume measurement unless you move to smokeless.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Yeah it’s by volume for black powder, I measure by volume & then average the weights of 3 loads by weight then weigh in grains by weight for consistency. Complete overkill…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: krub6b

jonkytron

Active Member
Feb 24, 2022
129
341
63
Rhode Island
Measured with a scale? Black powder is a volume measurement unless you move to smokeless.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
I measured by weight, and then poured it into my volume measure.. most often 100gr on the scale = 110 grains by volume give or take a little bit.. I just find it more precise on the scale and better groups.. got me hitting bullseyes very quickly doing it like this.. since it says 150 grains by volume is max.. I havent weighed it once at 100 grains and had it more than 115gr by volume... so I think its ok this way right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigterp