I agree with you to a major extent however, I do think its important to point out that deer densities are not created equal across the country. I have no experience hunting in Alabama but I can say here in Michigan you can go out on just about any piece of public land and have a reasonable expectation of killing a deer. Now if you want to kill a mature deer, that's another story. Now do gimmicks and gadgets help get that done . . .not much in my experience. You do need to put some effort in to be successful and I do think it helps to be elevated . . . although not necessary.There's oftentimes a very calculated reason people go simple. Lord knows I've bought into about every gimmick there is to public land hunting. Climb high! Be meticulous with scent control! Use a lightweight stand! Use a saddle! No metal and nothing can make noise ever! No using a flashlight! Pour over the maps! Outhunt the other hunters! Go deep! Hunt like a beast!™
Those are all distractions and false gods. The ugly truth is you're either hunting where deer are and killing, or you're not. There's a reason hunting celebrities use whatever goofy gear they can get paid to use. When you're hunting where the critters are you can use any attractant, call, scents, or other silliness and be successful. But that takes money and/or time to achieve, and it's a lot easier to read a forum and buy some stuff on your lunch break than it is to find an area to hunt that makes you look like a better hunter than you are. I've burnt a lot of gas and a lot of boot leather to get to the point where I can shoot deer every weekend if that's what I want to do. Lord help me if those areas dry up because I'm not sure I have the drive to find more of them! But that effort has produced a tremendous ROI.
It's not the gear, and it's not the space between your ears. It's just the ability to separate the wheat from the chaff. That's 80% of it. Head knowledge is 80% of whatever is left over, and gear is the remainder. I'm not a good hunter. I just quit trying to pretend I was one and turned the games difficulty setting down to "easy." The indians had it right. You gotta move on to better hunting grounds sometimes instead of trying to make it work. That's some post-agriculture mindset bs right there.
Maybe its a relationship to the size of the available parcels or actual numbers of deer. I can't speak to that but there appears to me, after listening to some of you experienced southern hunter's advice, and comparing it to my own experiences in the north that there does appear to be some difference in relative opportunity counts. For the record I don't hunt AG land, mostly upland hardwoods and that's the basis for the majority of my experience.