- Joined
- Nov 27, 2014
- Messages
- 3,406
I agree bud. I’m just poking. Those Tethrd guys have been known to make it right.I did say “a bit”. But that definitely shouldn’t have made it into a box.
I agree bud. I’m just poking. Those Tethrd guys have been known to make it right.I did say “a bit”. But that definitely shouldn’t have made it into a box.
Agreed on that. Definitely not their mission to displease.I agree bud. I’m just poking. Those Tethrd guys have been known to make it right.
There was a $260 Predator on here this week already!
As far as saddles go I would trust a saddle made by Areohunter or Tethrd before I trust a DIY. You are talking about a cast platform not a saddle. Tethrd will make it right . It scares me to read some of the things some guys are making and using. I been saddle hunting along time and I have always trusted the saddle manufacturers. But I always check my saddles, steps ,sticks and platforms before ever use. I hope everyone has a safe and enjoyable season.Another reason I'm going the DIY route. In the haste of trying to fill orders, I wonder if any saddles made it out the door with defects..
That's like you trust me more than yourself. It wasn't a speculation as to the quality of either company. They're both great companies. And sure they'll make it right but it never should've made it out the door. It's not robots filling orders. Visual checks, for quality, should be the very last step before it's packaged. I've been in the manufacturing industry a long time and that would've costed someone their job. It was just a thought brother. Hope you have a safe and successful season as well.As far as saddles go I would trust a saddle made by Areohunter or Tethrd before I trust a DIY. You are talking about a cast platform not a saddle. Tethrd will make it right . It scares me to read some of the things some guys are making and using. I been saddle hunting along time and I have always trusted the saddle manufacturers. But I always check my saddles, steps ,sticks and platforms before ever use. I hope everyone has a safe and enjoyable season.
Not like they've had any failures in the gen 1s....was there ever a recall?
Why would there need to be a recall when we stopped selling the gen 1’s and replaced it with the gen2 and replaced any platform that had a problem? Seems like a decent way to handle it myselfI still have a gen 1 and plan to use it this fall. I love that thing lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We did test the v1 predator at a lab in mn but it wasn't a TMA lab. We tested three platforms to failure and the "weakest" one broke at 586#. So it would fall just short of a three hundred pound rating.
(You have to test at twice the advertised rating)
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Well damn if a little research won’t do you good!I"m not saying replacement of the broken ones wasnt a decent way to handle the broken platforms, it was- and from what I know they were replaced quickly and painlessly. BUT, without an announcement of sorts, notice, or recall consumers are unaware that there are even different "gens". The gen 2 was created because Gen 1's were failing (SOME, not all). There are Gen 1's on the used market. They were sold with a 300# weight limit.
According to Ernie during testing, one fell shy of the 300# rating:
(https://saddlehunter.com/community/...rsens-bowhunting-equipment-issue.12502/page-4 Post#79)
The design changed because some broke-1 out of 3 tested fell below the advertised weight rating. Approximately 33% of the tested platforms failed. How many gens 1's were sold? how many were replaced--1/3? Just like recalled ameristeps--not every single one dated with an "08" broke(and will), but all manufactured during that date, are recalled. Consumers have the right to know the risks associated with the Gen 1, the differences between the two platforms, and how to tell them apart so they can be educated and informed when they come across used gear. Heck, I bet the majority of tethrd customers dont even know there was a gen 1 or gen 2. It's highly unethical to knowingly sell used recalled gear, I believe its probably even illegal-- I would think the manufacturer would want to do everything they can to mitigate the potential safety risk associated with the product.
I understand recalls damage brand image, are extremely expensive, a nightmare logistically, and I'm sure a giant headache. But Manufacturers have a responsibility to their customers to communicate safety issues/concerns when their products potentially fall short. Again, why a design change to the Gen 2 and the discontinuation of the Gen 1 if there were not concerns about it breaking? I"m sure the tooling for manufacturing change wasn't cheap and Tethrd chose to invest in the redesign and manufacturing changes. Just doesn't make sense to not invest in the communication with the customers and a recall if there was a big enough concern to change the design. The only communication about broken platforms was on this site, not an official Tethrd website or marketing platform. In fact, there is a whole page on Tethrd website called "the Evolution of a Platform" (https://tethrdnation.com/evolution-of-a-platform/ ) that doesn't mention a single thing about a gen 1 or gen 2. Seems like a pretty important part of the evolution....
I"m not a lawyer, so I dont know if "legally" there should have been a recall. Just seems like it makes sense based upon the information at hand and the fact that there is a potential safety concern.
Was that the gen 1 or 2 ?I received my Tethrd predator platform today and noticed a potential manufacturing defect on the platform. For some reason there is a section of the platform that is ~40% thinner than the surrounding material. If you look at the pictures below you can see that the cast aluminum should be ~0.524” thick but it is only ~0.306” thick. [((0.524 – 0.306)/0.524) = 0.416 ==> 41.6%] I am a little concerned because I am not sure what factor of safety (FOS) Tethrd designed their platforms to. Has anyone else received a platform with a similar issue? The manufacture date on the platform is 07/01/2019. If you recently received a predator platform, I would suggest inspecting it for the same issue since it effects the strength of the platform.
View attachment 15409
View attachment 15410
View attachment 15411
Gen 2 is the only one shipping from Tethrd now. Gen 1 is obsolete.Was that the gen 1 or 2 ?
I have a gen one . I was one of the first to get them . My gen 1 is ok . I was wondering if the pic was genGen 2 is the only one shipping from Tethrd now. Gen 1 is obsolete.
Lol I just meant that as it’s a new platform straight from Tethrd, it can only be a G2. No harm no foul.I have a gen one . I was one of the first to get them . My gen 1 is ok . I was wondering if the pic was gen
2. No one said what batch it came from and witch one failed. I know they don't make the gen 1 because a few broke. My platform is not obsolete it still works. Lol
I"m not a lawyer, so I dont know if "legally" there should have been a recall. Just seems like it makes sense based upon the information at hand and the fact that there is a potential safety concern.
While that's not a structural member, I definitely don't like the looks of it. Please contact Tethrd directly and they will get it replaced.I received my Tethrd predator platform today and noticed a potential manufacturing defect on the platform. For some reason there is a section of the platform that is ~40% thinner than the surrounding material. If you look at the pictures below you can see that the cast aluminum should be ~0.524” thick but it is only ~0.306” thick. [((0.524 – 0.306)/0.524) = 0.416 ==> 41.6%] I am a little concerned because I am not sure what factor of safety (FOS) Tethrd designed their platforms to. Has anyone else received a platform with a similar issue? The manufacture date on the platform is 07/01/2019. If you recently received a predator platform, I would suggest inspecting it for the same issue since it effects the strength of the platform.
View attachment 15409
View attachment 15410
View attachment 15411
I hate even replying to this thread, since I know somebody is just going to skew my words but here's the deal. The 2x spec is an astm standard. It's not the law.I"m not saying replacement of the broken ones wasnt a decent way to handle the broken platforms, it was- and from what I know they were replaced quickly and painlessly. BUT, without an announcement of sorts, notice, or recall consumers are unaware that there are even different "gens". The gen 2 was created because Gen 1's were failing (SOME, not all). There are Gen 1's on the used market. They were sold with a 300# weight limit.
According to Ernie during testing, one fell shy of the 300# rating:
(https://saddlehunter.com/community/...rsens-bowhunting-equipment-issue.12502/page-4 Post#79)
The design changed because some broke-1 out of 3 tested fell below the advertised weight rating. Approximately 33% of the tested platforms failed. How many gens 1's were sold? how many were replaced--1/3? Just like recalled ameristeps--not every single one dated with an "08" broke(and will), but all manufactured during that date, are recalled. Consumers have the right to know the risks associated with the Gen 1, the differences between the two platforms, and how to tell them apart so they can be educated and informed when they come across used gear. Heck, I bet the majority of tethrd customers dont even know there was a gen 1 or gen 2. It's highly unethical to knowingly sell used recalled gear, I believe its probably even illegal-- I would think the manufacturer would want to do everything they can to mitigate the potential safety risk associated with the product.
I understand recalls damage brand image, are extremely expensive, a nightmare logistically, and I'm sure a giant headache. But Manufacturers have a responsibility to their customers to communicate safety issues/concerns when their products potentially fall short. Again, why a design change to the Gen 2 and the discontinuation of the Gen 1 if there were not concerns about it breaking? I"m sure the tooling for manufacturing change wasn't cheap and Tethrd chose to invest in the redesign and manufacturing changes. Just doesn't make sense to not invest in the communication with the customers and a recall if there was a big enough concern to change the design. The only communication about broken platforms was on this site, not an official Tethrd website or marketing platform. In fact, there is a whole page on Tethrd website called "the Evolution of a Platform" (https://tethrdnation.com/evolution-of-a-platform/ ) that doesn't mention a single thing about a gen 1 or gen 2. Seems like a pretty important part of the evolution....
I"m not a lawyer, so I dont know if "legally" there should have been a recall. Just seems like it makes sense based upon the information at hand and the fact that there is a potential safety concern.