BowhunterXC
Well-Known Member
Interesting, but definitely 2 entirely different sides of the coin, due to the totally different types of weapons and their method of killing.A high powered in the chest cavity will usually kill a deer. A fixed broadheads in the chest cavity may not have the same effect so to kinetic energy. In that logic is it less ethical to shoot an arrow at a deer? For the record, I sling arrows to, just play the devil's advocate side.
Hemorrhage is the killing method of a bow, thus extreme sharpness of the broadhead plays a huge part of the killing power.
Hydrostatic shock from a firearm's projectile is what kills. Going beyond that shock, becomes trama and an animal can run off "dead on its' feet". I used to work with a guy that always said, "There's no such thing as too much rifle." Overkill was not a word that was in his vocabulary.
I suppose it could be said that a firearm has a distinct advantage, for marginal shots....IF that firearm favors the big enough or bigger caliber for the type of animal being hunted.