My wish is to not tax the gear of all the non-consumptive users so as not to leverage their voice anymore than possible.
Already a lost cause. Only 4.6% of America hunts, and only about 25% of those hunters bowhunt. 17% fish (yay for Dingell-Johnson), 28% camp. 33% birdwatch.
Non-hunting conservationists already outnumber hunters. And in my experience they're much more vocal and involved. Me and a buddy were the only sportsmen present at last years public hearing regarding a plan to abandon a coal-ash pond a few yards from the Mobile River, upstream of 90k acres of hunting ground and hundreds of miles of waterways that get fished heavily. I joined the nonprofit fighting the power company, and I'll be the only hunter on the board I'm on.
Most of the PR tax dollars aren't generated by hunters already. 90ish percent of PR funds come from guns/ammo sales, and most of those sales aren't hunting related. Almost none of the hunting gear we talk about on here is taxed by PR. Just guns, ammo, and archery tackle. I'm all for expanding PR to include taxing saddles, sticks, stands, mineral licks, clothes, etc.
But that would be a drop in the bucket of funding that could be achieved if we'd tax the yuppies. Usage of wild areas has changed. The principle of PR and DJ (user pays) is super-democratic and has worked well enough. We've already expanded the idea once with DJ. We need to do it again.
And on a lighter note, if
@BTaylor is going to negate my second wish, I'd like to re-roll for deer to constantly emit a faint whistling noise so I can hear them where I can't see them.