Ok if you look at hitch cord, you have 2 or 3 numbers for strength-
1- hitch cord mbs
2- a rating for the sewn cord eye to eye or loop configuration
3- if it’s an eye to eye cord you’ll also have a basket configuration mbs.
let’s say you have 2400 for hitch cord. You couldn’t use it for an OSHA approved work positioning project because it would have an eye to eye rating of around 2000 lbs which even in basket would not hit the 5000 lbs and when used as a hitch would probably only hit something around 3500 lbs. When sewn into a loop, it would achieve almost the same as the eye to eye (probably closer to 3250 lbs or so). 1.5 is the number most commonly used to rate loop configurations even though technically two legs evenly split the load. This is to account for the loss of the knot or splice. So the cord is no longer rated by its original breaking strength but rather the strength of the loop. This is one reason arborist commonly USED 12 or 13mm lead lines because to get the break strength required for their friction hitch cords, Using traditional materials it would take a 9 or 10 mm cord to get the strength needed for the work positioning. Now days you have specialty cords that use technora and high tenacity polyester blends which achieve 5000 lbs cord strength in 8mm cords. It allows them to use skinner lead lines because of stronger smaller hitch cords. When I started addressing the concern I was talking to Brocky who has a very strong knowledge base of knots, and splices. But let’s say he showed up to a job with 5.5kN cord and then had an accident, the company and himself would be in trouble because it’s his responsibility as a skills based and trained worker to know how ropes react to knots, and that his system must meet the minimum requirements at its weak point. In that scenario, his weak point would far and away be the hitch cord. Even though lineman’s ropes are used In basket configuration, the ropes still must use the lead line mbs rules and the d rings on the harnesses still must be 5,000 break strength each not 2500 on each side.
Perfect world you are right, each leg sees identical load at perfect angle (looks good on paper) but real world fall force applications don’t always apply equally and friction hitches always cross or bend so there’s loss at that point as well as at the sewn or tied end(s). Sometimes one side is higher when you fall and catch, so the angle is greater and the load is applied to one side more than the other. Like Lowg said on the other thread, prepare to fail safely. That’s real world risk mitigation and it’s also why field technicians often have to change or utilize different things in the field than the engineers put on paper. I’m not taking a dig at your profession either, I’m simply stating that it’s not as simple as your numbers add up, and we do have to account for losses.