• The SH Membership has gone live. Only SH Members have access to post in the classifieds. All members can view the classifieds. Starting in 2020 only SH Members will be admitted to the annual hunting contest. Current members will need to follow these steps to upgrade: 1. Click on your username 2. Click on Account upgrades 3. Choose SH Member and purchase.
  • We've been working hard the past few weeks to come up with some big changes to our vendor policies to meet the changing needs of our community. Please see the new vendor rules here: Vendor Access Area Rules

Saddle Hunters! New Way to Climb!

sampotter

Member
Oct 20, 2014
99
173
33
So, here are some notes after doing 7 climbs and hunts using this method since last Thursday.

The first morning it was pouring rain. I went up a 12" tree and I'll admit it wasn't a whole lot of fun with water running down the inside of my armpits every time I slid my tether up the tree. Once I got up 20+ feet and started getting set up, I realized I had dropped my bow rope on the way up, so I got to try this method twice in the rain. Bonus! Luckily the rain quit at daybreak.

Up until this point I had tried this method with my Tree Saddle, but I hunt out of a Guido's Web. I found the fork to be a bit of a PITA with this method. It kept getting caught on the foot rope as well as pinching it if I wasn't paying attention. I ended up removing the fork for the evening hunt and haven't put it back on. I also believe there is something different in the design of the GW that makes it more difficult to use this method than the TS, but I haven't had a chance to get back in the TS to try to figure this out.

I'll admit, when I tried my 2nd climb that evening on an 18" tree and couldn't get off the ground, I felt like this method had some real limitations, as in only trees 12" and under. I just couldn't slide my foot rope up high enough to in turn be able to slide my tether up any further. I bailed and went up a 10" tree instead, which was a breeze. I sat there in that tree trying to figure out if this climbing method was really just a flawed idea that only works in certain situations or if I was just missing something. My ropes hadn't completely dried from the morning rain and the temperature had dropped considerably, so when I went to get down after dark, the normally soft and limp ropes now were a little stiff and held an open shape when I loosened them up. Because of this my foot rope dropped a little farther than I had planned and my feet came off my board. No problem, I just tightened the rope around the tree again and stepped back onto the board.... wait a minute.... what if I did this while ascending a tree? Pretty much the same thing I have now seen posted by another hunter (I can't remember his name without looking it up, Dave Mullen maybe?). I guess the only difference is I use both feet with something rigid to stand on and use a prussic for adjustability.

The next morning I attacked a different 18-10" tree using this newfound twist. I'd like to say I shot up the tree like a squirrel, but in reality I was learning and tweaking as I went, so I was more of an inch worm than a squirrel. The next 4 climbs I continued to do it this way instead of keeping my feet on the board. Doing it this way allowed me to go up bigger trees as well as get the maximum bite per cycle. Basically, I would raise my tether and then kneel against the tree to get my feet off the board. I would then raise the foot rope right up to just below the tether and then walk my feet up the trunk of the tree until I was back on the board. At this point you can either get into a squatting position and stand straight up or pull yourself up with your arms using your tether. Actually, a combination is probably best, but it sounds like more work than it is.

One thing for sure is that with both the foot rope and tether taught and with you in a standing position, the spot where each rope goes around the tree has a huge influence on efficiency and ease of climb. Too long and you have to reach too far above your head, too short and you can't get enough bite per cycle. I found the tether should be at shoulder height and the foot rope should be a little below crotch level. On me this is a little less than 30" of distance, which is about how far up a tree I could go with each cycle of moving each rope.

A lot of people like to use strapping for there tethers, bridges, etc. It certainly reduces bulk and some weight, but it sure can make an awful noise if you scrape it against a tree when it is stretched tight. The only other real noise issue I had was a spot on my GW where the strap that runs under the aluminum seat was under tension and was pinching the camo fabric against the seat really hard whenever I leaned back into the seat. This created a really bad creaking noise that I know wouldn't happen with the TS. I think I may be able to alleviate this on the GW with a piece of plastic bag or thin plastic sheeting between the seat and fabric. In any event, the actual climbing method can be super quiet if you stay off those loose barked trees like hickory. Those types of trees are impossible to climb quietly with any method unless they are pre-set anyway.

The piece of wood I used was 18" oak which I sanded to remove any sharp edges. I ran a piece of strapping through 3/8" holes drilled at either end of the board and up to a prussic knot that attached to the foot rope, which created a 10" high triangular opening into which my feet went. Someone suggested a longer board, which I am going to try (24") although the 18" fits nicely in my backpack. A longer board would obviously provide more room for your feet on larger trees. Another note: I used the foot rope/board combo as my platform for EVERY sit and I was bowhunting. I'll admit, I never had the opportunity to take a shot, but I did try every shooting position I'm used to and I think this has some real potential.

As it stands now, I'm just as excited about this method as I was on day one, even if I had some doubts for a few moments. I wish I had stumbled onto this back in September when there was still some hunting to be done...
 

redsquirrel

Administrator
Staff member
SH Member
Feb 19, 2014
14,971
20,238
113
NJ
WEBSITE
saddlehunter.com
If you think about it, this method is really similar to the one stick method.
 

sampotter

Member
Oct 20, 2014
99
173
33
redsquirrel said:
If you think about it, this method is really similar to the one stick method.

Minus the metal stick and the need to climb up, then down, then back up.
 

g2outdoors

Well-Known Member
Vendor Rep
Oct 3, 2014
7,448
8,638
113
42
Savannah, GA
FACEBOOK
g2outdoors
TWITTER
g2outdoors
YOUTUBE
G2Adventures
sampotter said:
redsquirrel said:
If you think about it, this method is really similar to the one stick method.

Minus the metal stick and the need to climb up, then down, then back up.

It is really similar to the 1 stick method.

Not sure what you mean by "up, then down, then back up." If you're doing the 1 stick method, there's no up and down.
 

sampotter

Member
Oct 20, 2014
99
173
33
g2outdoors said:
sampotter said:
redsquirrel said:
If you think about it, this method is really similar to the one stick method.

Minus the metal stick and the need to climb up, then down, then back up.

It is really similar to the 1 stick method.

Not sure what you mean by "up, then down, then back up." If you're doing the 1 stick method, there's no up and down.

This is the 1 stick method I am familiar with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NcroPLbzPc

In it, the climber climbs to the top of the stick to slide his tether up, then back down the stick to unstrap it to move it up. This is what I meant by up and down.
 

g2outdoors

Well-Known Member
Vendor Rep
Oct 3, 2014
7,448
8,638
113
42
Savannah, GA
FACEBOOK
g2outdoors
TWITTER
g2outdoors
YOUTUBE
G2Adventures
I understand what you mean now. I thought you meant up and down to the ground.

I really like your method. I'll probably end up messing around with it this off season.
 

kenn1320

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2015
2,753
990
113
He doesn't have to come back down, that's dependent on length of tether. He could just go up one step and slide a shortened tether up 1 step worth. He has his tether length set so 1 step down puts him at the sticks buckle, giving him the max travel per move.
 

Waymore

Active Member
Oct 25, 2014
199
40
28
Hey Sam what if you used a rock climber harness in conjunction with the GW? You could leave the web folded up until you get to your hunting height then drop the seat down. This way fork is no issue
 

sampotter

Member
Oct 20, 2014
99
173
33
Waymore said:
Hey Sam what if you used a rock climber harness in conjunction with the GW? You could leave the web folded up until you get to your hunting height then drop the seat down. This way fork is no issue


To me that is redundant. I'd just hunt out of the rock climbing harness then. To me, the fork is overrated. I'm going to want to wear knee pads for this climbing method anyway, so removing the fork isn't a deal breaker for me. The ridiculous squawking noise my GW was making would be though.
 

Stoney_06

New Member
Jul 21, 2016
32
10
8
42
Missoula, MT
LOCATION
Missoula, MT
SKYPE
Stoney_06
TWITTER
Stoney_06
Yes! I've been working on this idea too! Thinking on it for months. Glad to finally have found someone with the same idea!

I think this is a great idea for guys looking to have a climber on hand that's light and quiet in case they are pounding ground and find a spot they just have to get in a tree at.
 

Intrepid

New Member
Dec 8, 2015
26
2
3
I am definitely gonna try modify this method as well before I spend big money on climbing Spurs!
 

fawnzy

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2014
1,529
969
113
54
Mr. Potter! Very cool. Now if you could adapt a platform to stand on for the climb and the attach at the top.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

sir_tob

Member
May 16, 2016
84
19
8
Sam, were you able to become quieter lifting the feet up. Seems that the feet or legs would always drag along the tree bringing them up.

I like the lightness of the rig though. I hunt a long way from the road and this is clever.
 

fawnzy

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2014
1,529
969
113
54
fawnzy said:
This one is for DaveT to figure out
https://youtu.be/PfEVOcLpseg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Seriously, look at these things. Those bands look totally noisy, but what about using cables from a climber instead. Walk up, no damage. Walk down. You might even be able to use them as a platform at height.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stoney_06

redsquirrel

Administrator
Staff member
SH Member
Feb 19, 2014
14,971
20,238
113
NJ
WEBSITE
saddlehunter.com
fawnzy said:
fawnzy said:
This one is for DaveT to figure out
https://youtu.be/PfEVOcLpseg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Seriously, look at these things. Those bands look totally noisy, but what about using cables from a climber instead. Walk up, no damage. Walk down. You might even be able to use them as a platform at height.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Found it fawnzy! http://www.forestry-suppliers.com/produ ... p?mi=16601
I have had that exact thought in my head many times, but just wasn't sure how to make it work. I'm going to have to study this and see if a DIY is possible in a more huntable form. They're not exactly cheap either!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stoney_06

Maustypsu

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2015
1,139
274
83
I would be willing to donate a summit climber if it can be re-purposed to make a prototype.
Very similar design concept, just needs to be cut down and then re-sized/re-welded.