FletchDeep
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2018
- Messages
- 169
I have a sneaking suspicion that most of the people who follow the "throw more point weight at it" theory, just finally end up sending an arrow slow enough that it doesn't generate enough drag to plane off. I setup a recurve this year and it dang sure doesn't shoot clean holes in paper but an 1.5" fixed blade still hits the center at 20 yards. Now my compound is tuned to the gnats ass with an arrow that is adequately stiff. That's one of the main issues I have with the gender confused corn spreader's point weight tuning methods. With a modern compound and a release, it's impossible for an arrow to be too stiff if you tune to perfectly level (vertical & horizontal) nock travel. I know this how? I use a 6" firenock carbon inner tube in the front of my 300 spine goldtip, which equates to a seriously stiff arrow. I can shoot my 100 grain point at 300 fps, bullet hole through paper, perfect bareshafts, and broadheads. I can then screw in a 200 and 300 grain point and still shoot bullet holes. That wouldn't be possible if "too stiff" arrows reacted differently in a compound. There are only two categories of arrows for well tuned compound bows, stiff enough, and weak.