This thread is making me crazy.
Yes, it's location-specific. He says that in the book. Yes, it means you'll hunt less. Much less. He says that in the book. Hunt less, kill more is not a fair trade off for some folks. I get it. He gets it. But the data is the data.
I don't think he's much of a "beast style" hunter. He's mainly focusing on travel routes. Makes sense, because that's easier to not booger up. Most folks (myself included) mess up more than they succeed when hunting bedded deer. Moving deer are easier to kill, and they move down here when it's cold. His approach is "smarter, not harder." Why would he grind his butt off to kill deer when he can just hunt when the hunting is good, and bass fish or make money if it ain't? One is only given so much time on this ball of rock.
Sure, you can kill deer any day, maybe. But Sheppard's goal isn't just to kill deer here and there, maybe. Success for him is a deer or two every sit, and he has been achieving it for a long time. I'd guess there are maybe 3 or 4 guys on this forum who MIGHT be able to touch his kill numbers, but they wanna argue because it goes against the rhetoric and they killed that buck one time.
I get not everyone is a cardiovascular specialist with the ability to hunt at will. Not everybody lives on the edge of public land in Wisconsin, or travels the states to hunt whitetail full time, but we still listen to Infalt and THP because some of their points apply to us. It's baffling to see Sheppard thrown out by so many people, especially of they haven't even read the book.
My hunting success went up dramatically when I started saving my best spots for the coldest weather. I'm 100% sure it would for others living in the southeast as well. And you'd have more time to squirrel and duck hunt on the not so great deer days.