All outdoor writers hunt prime private property
the fact that Alabama has there tag limit speaks of the deer number down there so private land hunting must be a cake walk
all deer move during daylight in bedding area hence all the nay sayers in this thread
Do you have the luxury to only hunt south wind days or any day you can??
it’s just not relatable to most people in most areas...
Like I've said a dozen times now. If you want a blue print, you're reading the wrong book (Unless you're very much like the author in habits, hobbies, demeanor, time available for hunting, income, and geographical location). If you want some data driven information that is useful if you learn how to think critically, I think it's useful.
I read the book once a year before the season. I don't live in Alabama. I'm not a doctor. I don't hunt private land with very rare exception. I find the book tremendously useful, and in my dumb uneducated useless opinion, consider it the best foundation to a deer hunting career that a new hunter from any locale can read. Not for tactics. Not for his writing style. Not for anything other than to dispel the disney notions of animals, and get some ground truths in their head. But that's just me.
Here's how I can relate to the book. If you look at how I hunt, it more closely mirrors our very own
@WHW style. I walk until I find sign that forces me to hunt it. But I ground my expectations in the reality that on highly pressured public land, in the hot and humid southeast, deer just don't move long distances in daylight very often. So when I'm considering whether to scout properties I know, or look for new areas to hunt, or hunt my best spots, or picking an easy access spot, etc. - I'm doing so with that knowledge in mind. I prioritize fronts - I will work late nights and weekends to leave a Wednesday open to hunt the day after a front. Why? Well because deer move more in daylight hours when the weather is cooler. It's nice bonus less people are in the woods, but I don't hunt next to people. So that doesn't matter. Warm weekend - so don't hunt? Nah, I'll be in the woods. But I might chase squirrels while scouting. I might leave everything but the bow and just take off in a straight line. Am I getting in a tree in a travel corridor between bedding and food? Probably not. The odds a deer will be on its feet in daylight hours under my tree when it's 80* in that spot? Slim. Do I have a bedding area pegged, and feel like the deer are in it, and I can capitalize on the "right now" with conditions less than perfect - do I do it with warm temperatures and the wrong wind? Sure, sometimes. But I do it fully informed. And sometimes, I choose to do something else with better odds of being successful.
Why does everything have to be black and white? No one has denied the entire premise he promotes - temperature shows the strongest relation to deer movement across time. Why is no one denying this? You can't - because you can't or won't set up the proper experiment to do so, and even if you could, you most likely wouldn't find a variable we can "control" (in the sense of hunting or not) that is a useful as temperature.
I logged somewhere between 12-15 sits in a tree last year, maybe 40-50 hours "on stand". I killed two deer, missed one, and had deer in range on all but maybe 2-3 of those sits. Does that mean I only hunted a handful of days? Nope - I grounded my strategy in reality, and spent most of my time afield burning rubber. It led to really high odds of having deer under me when I decided to park it.
Good information is hard to come by these days. People who devote themselves to a hobby, craft, or career are rare these days. The fact that someone is willing to share their life's passion with strangers, and the good information is largely ignored because of preconceived notions is nothing new. He addresses the very issue in the book. I for one am grateful he shared. It has been integral to my success.