Curious what saddle hunters think of this proposed rule on State Game Lands and where does it leave saddle hunting if not clarified (not to mention use of climbing and arborist harnesses)?
Proposal: "Any person installing, using or occupying an elevated hunting location, specifically including treestands and other similar devices or platforms shall securely attach their person to the tree, treestand or other similar device or platform using a fall restraint device. For the purposes of this paragraph, a fall restraint device shall mean a full-body safety harness and tether system capable of fully supporting a person’s body weight during a fall event."
Since they specifically define a fall restraint device as a "full-body safety harness", I would interpret that saddle hunting, not to mention my RC harness, would be technically be rendered illegal on SGLs, right? Hopefully this is clarified, but just a heads up to the PA guys, might be worth contacting the PGC.
Other than that I think it's a good rule. Big brother overreach, maybe getting close, but it sends a good message anyway. Would it ever be enforced, probably not. But who knows. Maybe next they'll address the fact that some SGLs are approaching the level of having a permanent stand in every other tree.
Proposal: "Any person installing, using or occupying an elevated hunting location, specifically including treestands and other similar devices or platforms shall securely attach their person to the tree, treestand or other similar device or platform using a fall restraint device. For the purposes of this paragraph, a fall restraint device shall mean a full-body safety harness and tether system capable of fully supporting a person’s body weight during a fall event."
Since they specifically define a fall restraint device as a "full-body safety harness", I would interpret that saddle hunting, not to mention my RC harness, would be technically be rendered illegal on SGLs, right? Hopefully this is clarified, but just a heads up to the PA guys, might be worth contacting the PGC.
Other than that I think it's a good rule. Big brother overreach, maybe getting close, but it sends a good message anyway. Would it ever be enforced, probably not. But who knows. Maybe next they'll address the fact that some SGLs are approaching the level of having a permanent stand in every other tree.