I hate even replying to this thread, since I know somebody is just going to skew my words but here's the deal. The 2x spec is an astm standard. It's not the law.
I know for a fact that there are some other manufacturers out there that you guys all trust who haven't even gone through any third party testing. Based on the media I've seen, provided by both the suppliers and the customers, I don't know if they would pass if they did.
We did the testing at that time for our own knowledge, not because we were looking for a TMA certification. We felt comfortable that a 1.95 factor of safety was safe compared to a 2.0. If you paid attention, none of the "failures" happened because of a person standing on the platform. The failure of the rear corner was occurring during installation. It's annoying no doubt, but not a safety concern.
A lot of people like the gen 1 platform. I get requests for it all the time. And if you are careful during installation, it doesn't break. I also offer lifetime replacement on any platform that does break.
We didn't upgrade to a gen 2 because we thought it was unsafe or we were worried about the load rating. You are mistaken on that point.
We upgraded because we wanted it to be bullet proof. Good enough wasn't good enough for me. I wanted you to be able to toe hook it without concern even though the users manual says not to. Since I was paying to upgrade the rear portion of the mold, it made sense to upgrade the front portion as well. That is why the entire thing is stronger.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk