I’m sure it Carries better. It looks amazing. But by the time you add sticks, and ros the cost is astronomical and the weight isn’t any real savings. So I’m just wondering is the carry that much better to justify the cost?
I paid under $300 for mine, basically new, via Classifieds. So quite a bit less than a new TX5 Lonestar...or a new JX3.
I know they retail over $450, which is much more than other saddles, but compare what it takes to produce one vs most other saddles and the cost makes more sense.
It's not a goal of mine to champion or promote JX3. Some of the criticisms are unfair, and some of the advantages are a bit overblown, at least to me.
As far as system expense, cost is dependent on the chosen components. I have way more into my stand and soft saddle setups due to my personal choices in gear.
But, to generalize, many popular saddles are $250+ and platforms around $200, and folks normally add a day pack.
Assuming the same climbing method, a "typical" saddle + platform + pack is going to be a wash in price with a "typical" JX3 + ROS + pouches or bag.
The popular "mobile" hang-on stands are going to cost more than a platform, generally, but maybe RCH saves a bit over a saddle. Pack cost could vary greatly depending on how you want to carry the stand. Could be a wash, or quite a bit more than a JX3 setup.
A climber could be the least cost, perhaps.
All said, cost will depend.
Does it carry that much better to justify the cost? This isn't a question I've considered and I think the answer is, it depends.
I will say, it carries far better for than my Sit and Climb and daypack setup did. I don't think it will carry as well as my Kifaru frame pack when weighted down.
I wouldn't really call the JX3 a frame pack. It shares some commonalities, but it's a bit more limited. However, it feels very light with a moderate hunting loadout, such that I don't consider it heavy.