Which bridge option did you go with and why?
I went with the rope bridge option because from a confidence standpoint, i just feel like my brain tells me to trust the rope more with rope friction hitch more than webbing with a load rated tri glide.
Its just on the back of my mind, what if i got a tri glide that had a metallurgical defect and it happens to fail under load? I have no doubt that there is no way AH would put out something that they had much if any potential to fail. But thats the reason i picked rope bridge option.
Also why i am using a distel hitch and tender on my tether rather than a ropeman. Anyone have more insight to statistical probability of a rope/knot failing vs a mechanical device manufactured from metal?
Maybe this is all dumb . . . . We are all using carabiners lol.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I went with the rope bridge option because from a confidence standpoint, i just feel like my brain tells me to trust the rope more with rope friction hitch more than webbing with a load rated tri glide.
Its just on the back of my mind, what if i got a tri glide that had a metallurgical defect and it happens to fail under load? I have no doubt that there is no way AH would put out something that they had much if any potential to fail. But thats the reason i picked rope bridge option.
Also why i am using a distel hitch and tender on my tether rather than a ropeman. Anyone have more insight to statistical probability of a rope/knot failing vs a mechanical device manufactured from metal?
Maybe this is all dumb . . . . We are all using carabiners lol.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk