• The SH Membership has gone live. Only SH Members have access to post in the classifieds. All members can view the classifieds. Starting in 2020 only SH Members will be admitted to the annual hunting contest. Current members will need to follow these steps to upgrade: 1. Click on your username 2. Click on Account upgrades 3. Choose SH Member and purchase.
  • We've been working hard the past few weeks to come up with some big changes to our vendor policies to meet the changing needs of our community. Please see the new vendor rules here: Vendor Access Area Rules

My controversial view on tracking dogs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hang around a bow shop beginning of the season. 1/2 the guys walking in there don’t even unzipper their bow case till the day before season.

People are getting extremely lazy. It’s quite sickening. This is just one more example.
 
In Alabama they have to be leashed on public. No real laws on private.

I prefer to work my dog on an e-collar. Lead is a major PITA in the thick stuff down here. I can page him if he's working too fast and have him sit in place while I inspect for blood to confirm he's on-trail or figure out how in heck I'm about to get through the briars he juat plowed through.


The lead used with mine was a slick material with no loops. He’d just drop it and the lead would snake right through everything. I was impressed.
 
I want to add another thought to my initial statement. One other thing I consider is I really don't want to waste any of the trackers time. I feel it is my responsibility as a hunter to be able to follow through to the best of my ability on a shot that I made and calling someone else in with a dog should be a backup plan. In our state there are a limited number of trackers permitted by the state and they are volunteers. The two I have used I tipped generously for their time.
 
It seems like most are coming at this conversation as though most people calling a tracker have a trail that there is blood to see and follow; and a dead deer laying within 150 yards just a few minutes after the shot.

Speaking from experience, that's generally not who calls a dog.

Where a dog really shines is on stomach and intestinal hits where the deer could live many hours or even days. Often they leave very little visible sign and if you're waiting enough time for the deer to expire, the blood will be dry and much harder to pick out.

Most calls to a tracker involve a poor shot or poor shot selection. Improving that skill would result in a lot more recoveries than being a better tracker. You have to kill it before you can find it.
And this is where the trackers could also help in the process. I don't think the trackers in NYS are allowed to charge a fee as it was originally set up as a service to augment and supplement the efforts of the hunter after they tried to track and couldn't find the deer. I have had two occasions where I called a dog. Both deer were unrecovered. Both deer were bucks. One was a whopper..... my fault, I used a 7/8" diameter broadhead and it went just below the spine. It still haunts me. Anyway, at least how it used to work here in NY, you had to call, you spoke to dog tracker and he asked you a ton of questions first and most of it was trying to "wheedle" out the lazy SOB who didn't want to bother putting in the time and effort themselves first. But I agree with you @Bowonly, you would hope that would be the only time someone would elicit the skills of a tracker and tracking dog. And yes, they do accept donations but they are volunteers here in NYS. Unless that has changed. Its called "Deer Search" here in NY.
 
You talk about a good read about "The Second Hunt" there is/ was a blood tracking book by John Trout Jr. entitled "Trailing Whitetails" that should be required reading for all bowhunters.
 
As a lifelong houndsman I will go ahead and tell you that anyone who doesn’t want to use a dog when one is available on a questionable shot is just a fool If you truly want to do the animal the service it is worthy of then you use every tool available to you to recover the animal and I don’t give a damn how good a tracker you and your ego think you are you will never compare to the nose of a dog If you are worried about wasting a trackers time Then do him a favor and don’t stomp the woods over wandering all over allowing time to rolll and scent to diminish If the animal is mortally wounded you will find him If he is still alive and well you won’t Everybody involved will be able to sleep better and a lot less wasted game Rant Over
 
I think I agree in principal with @redsquirrel 's stance here. Poorly placed hits are going to happen. We as hunters are shooting in a different mind state than we practice in. We most often are threading an arrow through a veritable maze of obstacles, some we're aware of others we're not. Add to that the fact that the target moves before, during and after the release and you have a whole set of challenges that we don't face during the course of our practice sessions. Hunt long enough you'll have a bad hit . . . its inevitable.

When it happens the best course of action is to back out and let the deer lay down and die, hopefully soon and close. However, I don't think that necessarily means back out and immediately call the dog tracker. For me it means back out and give the deer some time to expire undisturbed. Then go back in, with a small crew, no more than 3 people total to pick up the track. It helps to have some help just to keep track of the last blood found and to maintain a sense of general direction of travel while the other guy searches for the next blood. If the blood trail is sparse, and sometimes even when it isn't, its often easier to see the deer's kick marks or tracks in the leaves than it is to find the blood. Finding those marks is what generally leads me to next blood. Too many guys and impatience will lead to those tracks being trampled. Also remember that a wounded deer will generally follow established trails as they make their escape. When in doubt, check the nearest trail. I have also found that, if I wait overnight and then head back to pick up the trail in the early morning while it is still dark, the blood most times will still be wet and is, at least for me, easier to see in the light of a Coleman lantern. I've recovered more than one buck right at first shooting light the following morning after a lengthy lantern track.

If the trail becomes indiscernible or if it has rained (or your in knee deep swamp) and there's no way to find visible blood then its time to call in the dogs. In my experience, with a little patience and some careful process, most of the time you can recover the animal on your own or determine that the wound was not likely fatal. For me the tracking is a part of the process that I enjoy.
 
I LOVE tracking deer an have helped many friends ove the years. With that said, when my last dog passed away I chose a replacement that I'd known for having good nose so I can train him to track deer.
I got him in early September. I told a few friends that if they had easy track Jon's and the time to call me so I could work him on successful tracks.
I'm amazed by how many phone calls I've gotten just by word of mouth asking to come try and find a deer. It really makes me wonder how many go unfound each year.
I talked to on guy that has a dog asking for advice, hee claimed that he was getting up to 40 calls a day...40!!!!
That's beyond a full time job.
The question I have is...Is that due to people making terrible shot decisions or not knowing how to track on their own?
With the said, if a guy gets that many calls, I almost feel like you have to charge people to look for them. Otherwise people will try to hit one wherever they can and the "call the dog"
Keep in mind that any time I/we spend tracking cuts into our time hunting as well. It's something I love to do but how do you weed out the people that just start shooting if they THINK they have a CHANCE at recovery

Sent from my SM-G781V using Tapatalk
 
I'm going to start off by saying that I love tracking dogs and I think they are an amazing asset and should be used whenever they can help recover a deer that might be otherwise lost. I have used a tracking dog twice with one successful recovery and I spoke to another handler on the phone prior to making a successful recovery on my own. Every time I have called for a dog has been when it rained between my shot and attempted recovery.

BUT.. I think they are leading to a loss of critical blood trailing skills in hunters. Over the past 5 years or so I continue to see threads posted across the internet where people seem to put forth a lackluster tracking effort and the responses are "just call a dog".

Blood trailing is an acquired skill. The only way to get good at it is to go out and shoot deer and track. You'll make mistakes, you'll jump deer your thought were dead, but you will come out of it a better blood tracker and be able to recover more deer on your own.
This is a valid point but I would also make an argument from my point of view as a handler of 2 black mouth cur recovery dogs (one is still in training). I'm apart of Nose to the ground in Virginia where we track for free. I walk through a set of questions with every hunter. This list is not in order, but goes like this. Tree or blind, if it's a tree how many feet up and how far was the deer? That's for an idea of the shot angle. I ask the orientation of the deer when the shot occurred, where the hunter thinks they hit, and how the deer responded when it left the hit sight. Lastly I asked how much have they tracked and for a picture of the blood trail if they have it, and what the blood trail was like. If it looks like a decent blood trail and everything is consistent with a solid vital shot I encourage the hunter to push farther to see if they'll pick up on blood again. Where I disagree with this is if the hunter puts forth 1000% before I arrive but it was an iffy shot, they've made my dogs job much harder. Now my dogs have to determine if the blood or scent from the interdigital gland on the ground is from the hunter tracking it through the woods on their feet or if it was the deer. My dog always has to determine if the hunter just did a figure 8 or if the deer did. In my opinion if you think you need a dog, especially with nose to the ground, reach out. The worst answer you can get from me is no, I'm not available. By the way, @Red Beard invited me to this forum a few weeks ago because I want to get into saddle hunting myself and I enjoy it!! Thank yall!!
 
I have also found that, if I wait overnight and then head back to pick up the trail in the early morning while it is still dark,the blood most times will still be wet and is, at least for me, easier to see in the light of a Coleman lantern. I've recovered more than one buck right at first shooting light the following morning after a lengthy lantern track.
The Coleman Lantern probably has saved many a bowhunter a lot of grief over the years.
 
Can something be learned? Definitely. More? I don't know. The tracks I've been on you are going at the dogs pace so if they pick it up good it can go pretty quickly. I just think each method has it's own advantages.

I've never used a dog, so my thought is conjecture.

I would think that in many cases an attentive hunter would discover stuff he/she overlooked. That's supposing the dog does it's part...and there's something to find...sign, dead deer, wounded deer.

When a hunter hits the limit with their own accrued skill, the learning kind of stops, no? Unless there is some later resolution, the result is some head scratching and possibly hunter conjecture that might lead to false assumptions in the future.

Anyway, that's where my assumptions are coming from about the dog thing.
 
I've never used a dog, so my thought is conjecture.

I would think that in many cases an attentive hunter would discover stuff he/she overlooked. That's supposing the dog does it's part...and there's something to find...sign, dead deer, wounded deer.

When a hunter hits the limit with their own accrued skill, the learning kind of stops, no? Unless there is some later resolution, the result is some head scratching and possibly hunter conjecture that might lead to false assumptions in the future.

Anyway, that's where my assumptions are coming from about the dog thing.
I like this discussion! I’ve recently heard on multiple platforms I immediately backed out & got a hold of a tracker. What’s troubling is you don’t know what effort was put forth in the initial assessment to make that call. I had a shot this season recently that all that was needed to recover a fatally wounded deer was time & woodsmanship , it turned out well. I had another that I lost all blood going through a marsh & went back out with the intention of grid searching, but also brought my beagle pup. He went through the marsh until it was too deep , I picked him up & got him to dryer ground he immediately started wind checking & signaling. He bee lined to my doe from the downwind side no blood trail. I think I would’ve eventually found that deer that afternoon but he saved me hours & I was able to spend that time back tracking her trail so I could better learn how she used that marsh to escape. It should help my recovery skills long term & maybe a new ambush spot… I don’t dislike the use of dogs I just don’t like if it’s being promoted as a bailout for iffy shots or poor woodsmanship.
 
I've never used a dog, so my thought is conjecture.

I would think that in many cases an attentive hunter would discover stuff he/she overlooked. That's supposing the dog does it's part...and there's something to find...sign, dead deer, wounded deer.

When a hunter hits the limit with their own accrued skill, the learning kind of stops, no? Unless there is some later resolution, the result is some head scratching and possibly hunter conjecture that might lead to false assumptions in the future.

Anyway, that's where my assumptions are coming from about the dog thing.

I started a thread a while ago about things you learned well after a hunt. You’re right. Lots of people tell themselves a story about what happened, especially when it goes wrong. Time and new experience often shed light on those stories.

I shot a deer a month ago. I thought it was about 30 yards away(it was about 35). Quarter to with right side facing me. I lined up it’s heart, had a great release, remember the deer dropping before turning to run, and hearing the pop of a diaphragm being deflated. Walk over to arrow and see light blood and fat - I either hit brisket or backstrap. Pick up blood 50 yards away that turns to good blood, trail it 200+ yards to dead deer. I hit it back of left side rib cage, exited left ham. If I didn’t find the deer, I would have assumed muscle hit on front of the deer. Pure luck we happened on blood when we did. If I didn’t see it in the next few yards I assume the deer was alive and well. In fact, that was my gut instinct on getting to arrow.

we tel ourselves stories. Any time we can get more information, it’s better.

Also, a dog would’ve walked right to the deer. Having said that, describing the shot, and sending a tracker a picture of the arrow, would’ve resulted in zero trackers coming to help.
 
I like this discussion! I’ve recently heard on multiple platforms I immediately backed out & got a hold of a tracker. What’s troubling is you don’t know what effort was put forth in the initial assessment to make that call. I had a shot this season recently that all that was needed to recover a fatally wounded deer was time & woodsmanship , it turned out well. I had another that I lost all blood going through a marsh & went back out with the intention of grid searching, but also brought my beagle pup. He went through the marsh until it was too deep , I picked him up & got him to dryer ground he immediately started wind checking & signaling. He bee lined to my doe from the downwind side no blood trail. I think I would’ve eventually found that deer that afternoon but he saved me hours & I was able to spend that time back tracking her trail so I could better learn how she used that marsh to escape. It should help my recovery skills long term & maybe a new ambush spot… I don’t dislike the use of dogs I just don’t like if it’s being promoted as a bailout for iffy shots or poor woodsmanship.
Me and my female Riley went knee deep in a swamp few weeks ago. We don't have too many swamps in Virginia. Track was 30 hours old and about 600 yds long. We bumped the buck off a bed. Confirmed it was him from the diarrhea and blood in the bed.
a8fa315ea48454713de1dfe090661895.jpg


Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
 
I know of very few people that have actually brought in a tracking dog, and it was always as a last resort. From my vantage point, I just don't at all see the over-reliance on it that some others are apparently seeing. However, the youtube hunting celebrities do seem to be using them more this past season, which I imagine is more for marketing and search term clicks. Perhaps that is both giving people the impression they are being used more, and also causing other hunters to be more inclined to use them before it is that "last resort".

Either way, if I end up gut shooting that big booner, I'd be counting my lucky stars to have a trained dog come out and help as a last option. I'd be sending that dog bags of treats for years to come :grinning:
 
How long before we attach Amsteel strings to our arrows? With expandable broadheads, good chance of ripping out the whole heart as the deer run away!

Scorpion " Get over here!"
I remember when those string kits for arrows were heavily advertised at least 30 years ago. There was also some old technology that placed a tracking chip in the arrow tip to locate the arrow, if it stayed with the deer.
 
This is a valid point but I would also make an argument from my point of view as a handler of 2 black mouth cur recovery dogs (one is still in training). I'm apart of Nose to the ground in Virginia where we track for free. I walk through a set of questions with every hunter. This list is not in order, but goes like this. Tree or blind, if it's a tree how many feet up and how far was the deer? That's for an idea of the shot angle. I ask the orientation of the deer when the shot occurred, where the hunter thinks they hit, and how the deer responded when it left the hit sight. Lastly I asked how much have they tracked and for a picture of the blood trail if they have it, and what the blood trail was like. If it looks like a decent blood trail and everything is consistent with a solid vital shot I encourage the hunter to push farther to see if they'll pick up on blood again. Where I disagree with this is if the hunter puts forth 1000% before I arrive but it was an iffy shot, they've made my dogs job much harder. Now my dogs have to determine if the blood or scent from the interdigital gland on the ground is from the hunter tracking it through the woods on their feet or if it was the deer. My dog always has to determine if the hunter just did a figure 8 or if the deer did. In my opinion if you think you need a dog, especially with nose to the ground, reach out. The worst answer you can get from me is no, I'm not available. By the way, @Red Beard invited me to this forum a few weeks ago because I want to get into saddle hunting myself and I enjoy it!! Thank yall!!
Where do you live? I know the county Redbeard is in so just curious how far you traveled for his track.
 
Where do you live? I know the county Redbeard is in so just curious how far you traveled for his track.
I live in Stafford County. It was only 30 minutes for me. Don't know if you're familiar with the VA area but I've gone all the way to great falls on a track. I've also gone all the way out to orange. We try to stay within an hour from home but it doesn't always work out like that.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top