I’ve made the point about the purpose of a lineman’s belt dozens of times here. It seems to be ignored or argued with mostly.
I would be curious if some of our arborists can chime in. It’s my understanding they never leave the ground with just spurs and a lineman’s belt. If they do it’s a squeeze that offers the same protection as a tether. They’re 100% tie off outside of that. I could be wrong.
Most industrial facilities have 100% tie off rules above 3,4, or 6 feet. Sure, rear suspension harnesses suck.
Rock climbers (not free climbers - clearly)don’t leave the ground without 100% tie off.
Hunters are the only people who leave the ground to do a dynamic activity at height, not 100% tied off from the ground up. It’s my firm belief that this is mostly due to three reasons:
- Ego
- They truly believe that the purpose of a lineman’s belt, or at least one of them, is to stop them safely in the event of a fall.
- complete lack of organized and effective best practices, safety information, training, and cooperation with manufacturers to promote these things. It’s cowboy all the way down.
None of this is a judgement. But if we could get a couple key facts into peoples’ brains, I think the orientation towards risk management would improve:
- the second you leave the ground, your risk of severe injury or death goes up exponentially, regardless of the gear training and procedures used.
- a lineman’s belt has a single purpose: to provide two additional points of contact(your hips) to aid in balance while performing tasks at height.
- saddle manufacturers, and people on YouTube and Facebook talking about saddles, are currently not in positions of authentic authority on tree climbing safety. The gap between hunters and industrial/arborist/rock climbing industries is a yawning one.